Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Myrddin
Don't bet on it. Those satellites don't function without an earth station uplink. RF transmission is under the control of the FCC. Most studio/transmitter links are RF too. Again, the FCC has jurisdiction. The FCC also regulates common carrier services (phone companies) that carry studio links (audio/video/control).

The satellite itself is beyond the reach of the FCC (and even the FAA :) ), as are any earth-bound uplinks that reside out of the US.

130 posted on 11/30/2005 6:10:41 PM PST by meyer (Dems are stuck on stupid. Al Gore invented stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]


To: meyer
The satellite itself is beyond the reach of the FCC (and even the FAA :) ), as are any earth-bound uplinks that reside out of the US.

The FCC has power to regulate the satellite operators. The operators want to do business with customers on U.S. soil. It is in their best interest to be cooperative. It took a long time for the FCC to permit local TV stations to be sent via satellite. The FCC rescind the permission to provide satellite service and to bill for those services on U.S. soil. They could also close the spectrum completely and reallocate it for another purpose. Your libertarian view of satellite operations doesn't square with the laws on the books.

131 posted on 11/30/2005 6:48:00 PM PST by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson