Savage has been against the use of the word "Insurgents" from day 1. That is what I was referring to.
They are the Enemy. That is the word Savage uses, among Islamofacists and occasionally Terrorists. But, he points out, we cannot have a War on Terror. It must be a War on Islamofacism. Once we get the terms right, we can identify the Enemy.
Small, but important points in psychological warfare.
And, let us not forget, the MSM went to school on Goebbels!
I was once OK with "War on Islamofascism" but now I see why the President chose to be more general in the naming. Baathists are more like hard-core leftists than Islamists. Bush has centered the war on terror, wisely, on the Godless socialist Baathists...leaving a "way out" for the Islamists to "save face". The way the western left has come to support the socialist Baathist terrorists is so shocking that many Islamists must be shaking their heads and wondering if they, the Islamists, really want a world in which they are allied with such nutcases plus the Godless Baathists. We can defeat the socialists and the Islamists can pretend to thank us for it...thus surrendering to us by making it look like they wanted the Baathists gone all the time. Our naming the WOT would be quite important.
Similarly, it is good that the President didn't call this WW3. That would have invited the enemy to make this more of a world war than it has been. WOT is a good name that gives everyone a chance to end hostilities at any time conditions are right and terror is renounced.