Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court descent
The Washington Times ^ | 11-29-05 | Arlo Wagner and Keyonna Summers

Posted on 11/29/2005 11:23:52 AM PST by JZelle

The front door and main steps to the Supreme Court will remain closed until an assessment of the damage is completed. Built in 1935, the Supreme Court building is one of the newer facilities on Capitol Hill, compared with the more than 200-year-old U.S. Capitol and other historical buildings. Maintenance on those buildings is done every one-to-three years, said Eva Malecki, a spokeswoman for the Architect of the Capitol Office, which oversees and maintains the U.S. Capitol complex. In 2003, inspectors checked the building's east pediment during a routine maintenance check, Miss Malecki said. "There were no indications at that time of any issue with the stone," she said. "We don't know what's up there, what may or may not need to be done, or if there are other flaws until we do a survey." Inspectors checked the building's west pediment in 1992, said an official with the Supreme Court's public information office. Much construction is under way at the Supreme Court building and adjacent under East Capitol Street for an underground visitors' center to the U.S. Capitol. The five-year $122 million Supreme Court building renovation includes a two-story, underground police station. However, officials said the construction and renovation did not cause the stone to fall.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: decay; marble; supremecourt
The country is decaying, literally!
1 posted on 11/29/2005 11:23:53 AM PST by JZelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JZelle

They could meet in the Clinton Library in the meantime.


2 posted on 11/29/2005 11:26:17 AM PST by brooklyn dave (Allah is a Moon god)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JZelle
Shouldn't this be in "breaking" news?
3 posted on 11/29/2005 11:33:14 AM PST by Constitutionalist Conservative (Have you visited http://c-pol.blogspot.com?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JZelle

It was probably something Ruthie Bader-Ginsburg said that caused it.


4 posted on 11/29/2005 11:33:42 AM PST by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JZelle
"We don't know what's up there, what may or may not need to be done, or if there are any flaws until we do a survey." Well, o.k. Here's one vote in your survey, THAT THERE ARE FLAWS, AND SOMETHING NEEDS TO BE DONE!
5 posted on 11/29/2005 11:33:50 AM PST by RightResponse (What if the Left, just got up and .....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JZelle
The front door and main steps to the Supreme Court will remain closed until an assessment of the damage is completed

Wouldn't bother me to see the whole court closed until Alito is confirmed.

6 posted on 11/29/2005 11:35:03 AM PST by taxesareforever (Government is running amuck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taxesareforever
"Wouldn't bother me to see the whole court closed until Alito is confirmed."

Same here

7 posted on 11/29/2005 11:41:08 AM PST by GregoTX (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JZelle
As I started reading your article, I got the feeling I was starting in the middle of it. Sure enough, here's Page 1...

Supreme Court descent

By Arlo Wagner and Keyonna Summers
THE WASHINGTON TIMES
November 29, 2005

Inspectors are trying to determine what caused a basketball-sized chunk of marble to break off from the facade of the U.S. Supreme Court yesterday morning as visitors stood outside.
    No one was hurt when a chunk of Vermont marble from the building's west pediment fell 100 feet and shattered when it landed on the steps near where the visitors stood, according to the Supreme Court's public information office.
    Any number of variables may have loosened the marble, including rust, moisture, a drop in outdoor temperature, natural decay or an imperfection with the stone itself, said William Dupont, chief architect for National Trust for Historic Preservation.
    (continues)...


8 posted on 11/29/2005 11:48:31 AM PST by newgeezer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer

My bad, sorry about that. Thanks for linking to page 1.


9 posted on 11/29/2005 11:50:49 AM PST by JZelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: JZelle

It is not the crumbling of the building with which anybody should be concerned.


10 posted on 11/29/2005 11:56:47 AM PST by Reaganghost (Democrats are living proof that you can fool some of the people all of the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JZelle
In 2003, inspectors checked the building's east pediment during a routine maintenance check, Miss Malecki said.

Yeah, they gave each dentil a sharp rap with a hammer to make sure it was sound.

11 posted on 11/29/2005 8:32:15 PM PST by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson