Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A la carte pricing urged for cable TV
washingtontimes.com ^ | Nov. 29, 2005 at 1:59PM

Posted on 11/29/2005 11:20:05 AM PST by april15Bendovr

A la carte pricing urged for cable TV Nov. 29, 2005 at 1:59PM Federal regulators are calling on the cable TV industry to let viewers pay for only the channels they want to watch.      

Currently, viewers' only choice of cable TV channels bundled packages, the Wall Street Journal noted.

      A Federal Communications Commission report says the industry should let viewers choose and pay for individual channels, which the regulatory body says will ultimately save consumers money.  

     "This report will conclude that a la carte could be in the best interest of consumers," an FCC official told the Journal. The report also suggests "themed tiers" of channels, the official said.

      The FCC cannot force the cable industry to change the way it does business, the Journal noted.  

     The industry claims a la carte programming would raise costs and ultimately reduce the number of networks offered.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cabletv
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last
Please join general chat on this topic.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/1530286/posts?page=13

1 posted on 11/29/2005 11:20:07 AM PST by april15Bendovr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/1530286/posts?page=13


2 posted on 11/29/2005 11:20:49 AM PST by april15Bendovr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: april15Bendovr

Cable industry won't do it.


3 posted on 11/29/2005 11:22:42 AM PST by calrighty (. Troops BTTT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: april15Bendovr

Good idea. Fifty bucks a month for five or six watchable channels is pretty bogus...


4 posted on 11/29/2005 11:24:48 AM PST by Kenton (Muslims want to play by their own version of "girls' rules")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kenton
Good idea. Fifty bucks a month for five or six watchable channels is pretty bogus...

I'd rather pay $50 a month for 5 or 6 good channels than $100 a month for total garbage...

5 posted on 11/29/2005 11:25:57 AM PST by frogjerk (LIBERALISM - Being miserable for no good reason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: april15Bendovr
A la carte pricing urged for cable TV

This will be the death knell for Liberal TV. CNN, MSLSD, MTV, MTV2, LOGO, and all the other crap lib channels that get no ratings will die a well deserved death. Subsides from bogus cable "packages" will no longer keep the garbage channels from spouting their BS...

6 posted on 11/29/2005 11:28:34 AM PST by frogjerk (LIBERALISM - Being miserable for no good reason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: april15Bendovr
FANTASTIC!!!!

"A la carte pricing urged for cable TV Nov. 29, 2005 at 1:59PM Federal regulators are calling on the cable TV industry to let viewers pay for only the channels they want to watch.

Finally the Feds are doing something worth while! Hope and pray it happens.

7 posted on 11/29/2005 11:31:39 AM PST by stopem (Get yourTexas Trash.( on my homepage.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: april15Bendovr
The industry claims a la carte programming would raise costs and ultimately reduce the number of networks offered.

If I am charged more for FOXNEWS and nothing for CNN (Which will be off the air) I will be content. Ratings will actually be ratings, not BS, pumped up, TV Guide "The best shows your not watching" phony Nielson ratings. All of those horrible reality shows will have the proper stake driven through their hearts.

8 posted on 11/29/2005 11:31:46 AM PST by frogjerk (LIBERALISM - Being miserable for no good reason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stopem
Federal regulators are calling on the cable TV industry to let viewers pay for only the channels they want to watch.

COMMON SENSE PING!

9 posted on 11/29/2005 11:32:32 AM PST by frogjerk (LIBERALISM - Being miserable for no good reason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk

That is the exact point I am trying to establish in the general chat posts.


10 posted on 11/29/2005 11:33:06 AM PST by april15Bendovr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: april15Bendovr

The technology is there and it can be done. I would love this so I could get rid of channels I never watch or intend to watch. I probably could cut at least 5 to 10 stations I have no interest in. Now the big question is will the cable company give me a better rate or charge me more for the Al LA Carte service???????????


11 posted on 11/29/2005 11:35:09 AM PST by Captain Peter Blood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Captain Peter Blood

It will if Ted Turner has his say I would imagine.


12 posted on 11/29/2005 11:37:04 AM PST by april15Bendovr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Captain Peter Blood
Now the big question is will the cable company give me a better rate or charge me more for the Al LA Carte service???????????

Probably not but wouldn't it be better to actually pay for what you want?

13 posted on 11/29/2005 11:37:33 AM PST by frogjerk (LIBERALISM - Being miserable for no good reason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: april15Bendovr
I was writing letters to the editor over 20 years ago calling for the same thing, knowing full well that I was living in fantasyland to think the industry would actually do it. I still had to vent, though, at the outrage of paying about $20 a month for five or six channels. Well... it seemed like a lot of money back when I was a poor college student...
14 posted on 11/29/2005 11:37:45 AM PST by Constitutionalist Conservative (Have you visited http://c-pol.blogspot.com?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: april15Bendovr
It will if Ted Turner has his say I would imagine.

Ted Turner most likely wouldn't go for it because it would kill CNN once and for all...Who would want to pay specifically for that crap?

15 posted on 11/29/2005 11:38:50 AM PST by frogjerk (LIBERALISM - Being miserable for no good reason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: april15Bendovr
ultimately reduce the number of networks offered

This is a bad thing?

16 posted on 11/29/2005 11:39:50 AM PST by Constitutionalist Conservative (Have you visited http://c-pol.blogspot.com?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Captain Peter Blood
They ain't gonna charge ya less, and you can take that to the bank!
17 posted on 11/29/2005 11:41:08 AM PST by Roccus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Captain Peter Blood
The technology is there and it can be done.

Correct. Pay-per-view already exists and it would only be an extension of it. If the cable company provided a simple web site or phone menu system you could pick once a month or so what channels you wanted for that month and that would take care of your viewing choice and billing.

18 posted on 11/29/2005 11:41:56 AM PST by frogjerk (LIBERALISM - Being miserable for no good reason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Captain Peter Blood

I think you already know the answer to that, it would probably be $20.channel


19 posted on 11/29/2005 11:42:33 AM PST by mel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk
What I meant is Ted would want us to fund all the liberal channels that nobody wants to watch.

Sorry I wasn't very clear on my point

20 posted on 11/29/2005 11:44:10 AM PST by april15Bendovr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson