Posted on 11/29/2005 11:06:07 AM PST by JZelle
DENVER -- The scandal at the heart of last year's University of Colorado sex-and-alcohol recruiting story had less to do with the football team than its critics. In "Buffaloed: How Race, Gender and Media Bias Fueled a Season of Scandal" (Buffalo Books: 2005), author Bruce Plasket says a feminist district attorney and journalists eager to believe the worst combined to demonize the reputations of the players, coach and university. "This is a case where political correctness trumped factual correctness," says Plasket, a longtime Colorado journalist who covered the story for the Longmont Daily Press-Call. "The media took one-sided information and press releases to create a scandal that didn't exist." There's a story behind the book, too: Plasket had to self-publish after two publishers withdrew, apparently scared off by warnings of litigation from the attorney for one of the female accusers. He wound up delivering copies to bookstores from the back of his Chevy Cavalier, but his persistence paid off. "Buffaloed" has emerged as a hot seller for the Colorado-based Tattered Cover Book Store chain, hitting No. 3 on the state's best-seller list for paperback nonfiction.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
Now how did I know this was the case from the gitgo???? P.C. strikes again in Colorado.
apparently scared off by warnings of litigation from the attorney for one of the female accusers.
That would be Lisa Simpson host of the 7 December 2001 party.
![]() |
Slim citations, faulty reporting mar worthwhile "Buffaloed" November 19, 2005
The book bears the scars of self- publication: numerous typos, repetition and poor editing. The most significant problem, though, is that the book has no endnotes or other citations, and frequently cites sources too vaguely. For example, Plasket accurately writes that "several witnesses" at Simpson's infamous Dec. 7, 2001, party, said they saw her passing out condoms shortly before her sexual encounters. But Plasket fails to explain that those witnesses were football players and recruits - a fact that makes the testimony significantly less credible than if the witnesses were Simp- son's friends. Also, Plasket goes to preposterous lengths to demonize the city of Boulder as racist. He even describes a 1973 incident in which a CU student told a black freshman football player to stop throwing rocks at squirrels. Many of Plasket's criticisms of the media, however, are accurate. Plasket writes that the press failed to inform readers about the background of Regina Cowles, the head of the Boulder chapter of the National Organization of Women, who was frequently quoted in the press expressing her outrage about CU. Cowles was the campaign manager for CU Regent Cindy Carlisle, who is married to Baine Kerr, Simpson's attorney. My review of Rocky Mountain News and Denver Post archives confirmed Plasket's charge. There were 17 News and 13 Post articles about CU in which Cowles appeared. Only once did the Post mention Cowles' connection to Carlisle, and the News never did. Buffaloed fumbles in discussing the case of Ron Monteilh, the CU wide receiver who was victimized by a false accusation of having given marijuana to teenagers at Simpson's party. Boulder District Attorney Mary Keenan charged him with a felony and, as a result, his name appeared in at least 10 articles in the Post and three in the News reiterating the charge (which Keenan's office finally dropped). Plasket quotes Monteilh's mother that after Monteilh was exonerated, the exoneration appeared only in "one line in one paper." Mrs. Monteilh might sincerely believe so, but Plasket should have known better. The Post on Aug. 18, 2002, and the News on the next day printed full-sized articles on Monteilh's innocence. The News followed up on Aug. 27, 2002, with a short editorial praising CU for standing by the victim of a false accusation. Shortly before the subsequent football season, the Post (Aug. 29, 2003) ran a long biography of Monteilh, restating his innocence, and providing numerous testimonies to his virtues. In the spring of 2002, there were many stories in the News and Post reporting that four football players were under investigation for rapes allegedly perpetrated at the Simpson party, and that DNA tests were being conducted. Plasket writes, "None of the four were connected to the incident by DNA tests - a fact that, in spite of its importance to the story, has never been reported by the media." The four players were suspected of abetting the rape of Simpson, rather than of raping her themselves, so the absence of DNA evidence is not necessarily conclusive. But if the DNA tests were important enough to mention over and over when they were being taken, then the finding of no DNA evidence against any CU player merited at least an acknowledgement. Plasket is also right that the media seriously underemphasized the credibility problems of the second plaintiff in the case. According to Buffaloed, the second plaintiff filed her own lawsuit in December 2003, two years after the party; in the interim, she had told police that her own sexual activity at the party was consensual. Plasket also writes of a Boulder police detective's report stating that the plaintiff told Boulder Daily Camera columnist Neil Woelk about the party, and "later told me she embellished what she had seen." Moreover, according to Plasket, "In March of 2005 Woelk said that when \[she] approached him days after the party, she denied being raped." Plasket himself, however, should have also included some other relevant facts - such as the witnesses who said the plaintiff was far too drunk to consent to sex, and that she was clearly traumatized the next day. The evidence of sexual assaults by football players is weaker than most of the media has asserted, but is still stronger than Plasket admits.
Dave Kopel is research director at the Independence Institute, an attorney and author of 10 books. He can be reached at davekopel@RockyMountainNews.com. Copyright 2005, Rocky Mountain News. All Rights Reserved. |
Who is this guy kidding? I see these flaws in plenty of non-self-published books, not to mention daily newspapers.
So the book is by an anti-racist who bashes the anti-sexists for putative racism and an anti-jock mentality? Which program of therapeutic enlightenment and tolerance will win?(pity they can't both lose)
Such disdain for college football is of course often well deserved. The bad joke of jock academics are a blot upon the intellectual life of the university, a symptom of the dumbing down of America.
And when the head coach is the highest paid government employee, something's askew.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.