Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bad for a President Not to be Poll-Driven? Hersh Harps on W's Long-Range View
Today Show/NewsBusters ^ | Mark Finkelstein

Posted on 11/29/2005 5:17:43 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest

by Mark Finkelstein

November 29, 2005 - 08:00.

Give me a moment, please. Got to let my head stop spinning. Been watching the Today show.

See, I thought we all agreed it was bad for presidents to be poll-driven, in the image of a Bill Clinton deciding everything from foreign policy to vacation destinations based on the latest shift in public opinion.

Turns out I was wrong, at least according to this morning's Today.

Matt Lauer interviewed New Yorker reporter Seymour Hersh, or "Sy" as Lauer chummily called him, regarding Hersh's piece in the magazine's current edition. As Lauer described the article, it portrays Pres. Bush as believing he has a "divine mission" to bring democracy to Iraq. Asked who was telling him that, Hersh responded:

Some of the people in the last few months with whom I've been talking for years are suddenly opening up and telling me some of their deeper concerns about this president's inability to adjust, to accept new information. I think he really does think that he's not going to be judged by today. The events on the ground will be judged in 20 years, 30 years or whatever.

But, but, but . . . isn't that good? Don't we want our presidents to set policy based on the nation's long-run best interests rather than on the ephemeral views of the day? Apparently not, per the MSM, at least so long as George Bush is in office.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: lauer; mediabias; syhersh; todayshow
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-22 last
To: governsleastgovernsbest
But, but, but . . . isn't that good? Don't we want our presidents to set policy based on the nation's long-run best interests rather than on the ephemeral views of the day?

When a President thinks that way, the MSM's ability to influence the national agenda is reduced to zero - that's Hersh's real problem with Bush.

21 posted on 11/29/2005 6:35:18 AM PST by Mr. Jeeves ("When government does too much, nobody else does much of anything." -- Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

These people - - the liberal Democrat partisans like Hersh - - seem incapable of digesting the fact that Bush won twice, has over three years left as President, and can govern as if he doesn't have to be concerned with getting re-elected. Because indeed Bush DOESN'T have to be concerned with getting re-elected. D'oh!


22 posted on 11/29/2005 7:21:45 AM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-22 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson