Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

British Doctors “Increasingly Uneasy” with Abortion Survival Rate Reports Times
LifeSiteNews ^ | 29 November 2005 | Hilary White

Posted on 11/28/2005 7:44:33 PM PST by Aussie Dasher

LONDON, November 28, 2005 (LifeSiteNews.com) - The weekend edition of the London Times carries a report that provides insight into what pro-lifers identify as the moral vacuity of media representation of abortion. In a story on “botched” abortions the Times reports on the latest British medical scandal: that some of the intended victims survive.

A government agency has published a report titled, “Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health (CEMACH),” that shows, to the horror of the British medical establishment, that up to 50 babies survive abortion every year in Britain.

The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, says the Times, requires that babies whom the mother chooses to kill after 21 weeks and six days of gestation must receive an injection of potassium chloride into the heart “before being delivered.” The article states blandly that “in practice, few doctors are willing or able to perform the delicate procedure.”

In an unusually frank admission, the Times neglects the standard journalistic euphemisms that soothe public conscience in abortion coverage. Instead of speaking of “terminations” and “foetuses,” the Times refers to “babies.” Instructions to abortionists doing early term abortions in Britain require that the drugs used should “prevent such babies being alive at birth.”

Britain has one of the highest rates of abortion per live births in the world with abortion on demand available through 24 weeks gestation. British women seeking abortions later than 24 weeks can be sent without criminal penalty to Spain where facilities are available for “preventing such babies being alive at birth.”

As with human fecundity, the problem of children surviving abortion refuses to go away quietly and, according to the Times, doctors are “increasingly uneasy” with it. While disclaiming that he is not “anti-abortion,” Stuart Campbell, former professor of obstetrics and gynaecology at St George’s hospital, London said that abortion botching is “substandard medicine.”

“If viability is the basis on which they set the 24-week limit for abortion, then the simplest answer is to change the law and reduce the upper limit to 18 weeks,” said Campbell.

Catholic World News’ resident pseudonymous blogger and commentator, Diogenes, drew the obvious comparisons. “Skill at saving babies' lives is improving, skill at ending them is in short supply. The result: half a hundred stubborn little bastards -- breathing and crying -- who won't do the sporting thing and die. No wonder the health service is upset.”


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: abortion; abortionsurvivors; babykillers; deadbabies; godhavemercyonus; infanticide; latetermabortion; life; murderers; prolife; sicksociety
I feel almost as sick as the society that allows such barbarity to occur.
1 posted on 11/28/2005 7:44:35 PM PST by Aussie Dasher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

A Hillary-fix would ensure that those babies never be born... how wonderful.


2 posted on 11/28/2005 7:46:14 PM PST by SteveMcKing ("No empire collapses because of technical reasons. They collapse because they are unnatural.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07

FYI. It is odd just how impervious some consciences are when it comes to obvious and incontrovertible facts isn't it, in this case the facts which make third trimester abortions the moral horror and outrage that they are - at least to this conscience.


3 posted on 11/28/2005 7:49:42 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
London said that abortion botching is “substandard medicine.”

Ya, it is malpractice not to effectively kill with certainty fetuses that are capable of living on their own isn't it, so says Alice looking on the other side of the looking glass? The use of the term "medicine" in this context is truly nauseating, just nauseating.

4 posted on 11/28/2005 7:53:25 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

repeat of earlier post


5 posted on 11/28/2005 8:02:01 PM PST by yldstrk (My heros have always been cowboys-Reagan and Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk

and they're still killing babies, too...


6 posted on 11/28/2005 8:11:30 PM PST by Aussie Dasher (The Great Ronald Reagan & John Paul II - Heaven's Dream Team!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

What is sick is that the Liberals who would decry the clubbing of baby seals would advocate that if it's a human baby that was intended to be aborted.


7 posted on 11/28/2005 8:13:18 PM PST by highlander_UW (I don't know what my future holds, but I know Who holds my future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Torie
Image hosted by Photobucket.com i understand not being able to save an old person from dieing... but just how hard can it be to murder a baby still in it's womb??? Department of Health indeed!!!
8 posted on 11/28/2005 8:36:20 PM PST by Chode (American Hedonist ©®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

pingout tomorrow.


9 posted on 11/28/2005 8:37:25 PM PST by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Torie; All

This is truly sickening.

It is 1984, folks. Words have no meaning.

But actions do. God is not pleased.


10 posted on 11/28/2005 9:31:39 PM PST by jacquej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
Britain has one of the highest rates of abortion per live births in the world with abortion on demand available through 24 weeks gestation. British women seeking abortions later than 24 weeks can be sent without criminal penalty to Spain where facilities are available for “preventing such babies being alive at birth.”

The British National Health Service presumably provides this (murderous) "service". Orwell's 1984 indeed. Is the Spanish connection partial-birth abortion execution; or do they do a Cesarean and garrote the child?

11 posted on 11/28/2005 10:19:25 PM PST by mtntop3 ("He who must know before he believes will never come to full knowledge.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
Link to the London Times' piece
12 posted on 11/29/2005 10:15:08 AM PST by newzjunkey (Why we fight for a free Iraq: http://massgraves.info/ -- Don't spare Tookie, Arnold!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Torie
The new oath for abortion Doctors?

Screw Hippocrates, if we don't kill'em the first time we dam well will get'em the second time around.

Having said that most countires in Europe have many more restrictions on abortion than does the good ole USA. I can't tell you how much that torques me off.

13 posted on 11/29/2005 10:44:35 AM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson