Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne
Name one facet of today's proposal that is different that what has been floated before.

Actually three major things are different.

One, he wants to send the immigrants back to their home towns hundreds of miles back in the middle of Mexico, instead of dumping them a couple of miles away from the U.S./Mexican border.

Two, he does not want to release caught illegals back out onto the streets and expect them to show up for court to be deported, but instead hold them until they are processed and deported.

Three, get rid of the time limit on how long a illegal can be held if their home country does not take them back, in other words, hold them indefinitely if necessary.

240 posted on 11/28/2005 3:46:36 PM PST by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies ]


To: Paul C. Jesup

"Three, get rid of the time limit on how long a illegal can be held if their home country does not take them back, in other words, hold them indefinitely if necessary."


SCOTUS already did that when they ruled we no longer have to ASK a host nation's PERMISSION to return their OWN citizens back to them.


243 posted on 11/28/2005 3:50:20 PM PST by BlueStateDepression
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies ]

To: Paul C. Jesup

Paul, please explain how these new promises are going to work in light of the fact that we'll be legalizing the illegals already here, and just about anyone else who wants to come here will be able to with a nice new shiney work permit.


251 posted on 11/28/2005 4:00:53 PM PST by DoughtyOne (MSM: Public support for war waining. 403/3 House vote against pullout vaporizes another lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson