Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congress Acts To Let Wounded Soldier To Keep Her On-Duty Dog
Pittsburgh Post-Gazette ^ | Nov. 28, 2005

Posted on 11/28/2005 5:40:47 AM PST by Wolfie

Congress acts to let wounded soldier to keep her on-duty dog

McKean County native to adopt 'Rex,' her bomb sniffing canine

This is the story of a soldier and her dog, and the act of Congress required to keep them together.

It began in July, when Air Force Tech. Sgt. Jamie Dana woke up, confused, in a hospital bed at Walter Reed Army Medical Center in Washington, D.C.

Her last memory was riding in a military convoy in Iraq after she and her bomb sniffing dog, Rex, had searched a village. She remembered being in extreme pain. And she remembered asking frantically about Rex, eventually being told that he had not survived.

But she didn't know that the military had told her husband, fellow Air Force security officer Mike Dana, that she wasn't going to survive her injuries.

She didn't know that, after a bomb exploded under her Humvee, she spent more than a week in military hospitals in Iraq and Germany before arriving in Washington.

And she didn't know that Rex had survived the bombing with only a minor burn on his nose.

Click here for rest of story.

(Excerpt) Read more at post-gazette.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: doggieping; iraq; militarywomen; workingdogs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-176 next last
To: Ditto

Why be personal? If you want to discuss my post, please do so.


61 posted on 11/28/2005 7:44:33 AM PST by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: AnAmericanMother
Ah - I don't know about the e in place of the umlauts :~D and I don't know how to make one. But when I see it in print, even without umlauts, in America, it's Schutzhund. (United Schutzhund Clubs of America - For the German Shepherd Dog)
62 posted on 11/28/2005 7:45:16 AM PST by HairOfTheDog (Join the Hobbit Hole Troop Support - http://freeper.the-hobbit-hole.net/ 1,000 knives and counting!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Wristpin
I can understand the debate on this thread as to the dog belonging to the MIL and if it should be/could be retrained for another handler vs retired and staying with this soldier.

I do think you should back off your argument as to whether this soldier is being selfish. SHE is not. She volunteered to put her life on the line for love of God and Country.

She has been blown up for her unselfish acts.

So, let's leave the subject on the dog being MIL or retirable.
63 posted on 11/28/2005 7:45:48 AM PST by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Wristpin

Well, your gut didn't make this call. Others did.

Unless it's vital to you to lobby to go take it back from her, it's done.


64 posted on 11/28/2005 7:46:54 AM PST by HairOfTheDog (Join the Hobbit Hole Troop Support - http://freeper.the-hobbit-hole.net/ 1,000 knives and counting!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Wristpin
My gut tells me the right thing to do is leaving it in the field saving soldiers lives.

My gut tells me that calculation was already made by the CO, and the CO ran it up the chain because he either didn't need that particular dog any more or it was rendered unsuitable somehow. That's why congress had to get involved, to allow the command to do this. If the command is OK with it, I'm OK with it.

That, and it is a small price to pay. Not all soldiers have such a tangible way to say thanks to them as this.

65 posted on 11/28/2005 7:51:29 AM PST by Ramius (Buy blades for war fighters: freeper.the-hobbit-hole.net --> 1000 knives and counting!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: cynicom

Is it ridicule of the Purple Heart you intended or ridicule of the Air Force?


66 posted on 11/28/2005 7:51:49 AM PST by Ditto ( No trees were killed in sending this message, but billions of electrons were inconvenienced.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

"She has been blown up for her unselfish acts.

True, and many others WILL be blown up. Let's not forget that.


67 posted on 11/28/2005 7:52:02 AM PST by Wristpin ( Varitek says to A-Rod: "We don't throw at .260 hitters.....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Darnright; AnAmericanMother

That website is run by a guy I know, and he's a dog-God. :~D

I trained with him when he was still doing open obedience classes. He's since trained dogs and competed worldwide.


68 posted on 11/28/2005 7:53:14 AM PST by HairOfTheDog (Join the Hobbit Hole Troop Support - http://freeper.the-hobbit-hole.net/ 1,000 knives and counting!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog
I'm just going by the verb "schützen = to protect", which does have an umlaut. On the other hand, compound nouns containing the root "schütz" don't necessarily have an umlaut (I went and looked in my German dictionary). Schutzhund, however, did NOT make even my big Collins hardcover dictionary. And the German websites have the word with and without . . . so who knows?

I have found that a lot of people on the internet, even in Germany, don't bother with the umlauts because it's a lot of trouble to go to system tools, open up the character map window, and select and copy the necessary letters.

Any native German speakers out there?

69 posted on 11/28/2005 7:53:49 AM PST by AnAmericanMother (. . . Ministrix of ye Chace (recess appointment), TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Ramius

The reason why Congress has to be involved is that Federal Law forbids an individual from receiving US Government property that is still usable.


70 posted on 11/28/2005 7:54:31 AM PST by Wristpin ( Varitek says to A-Rod: "We don't throw at .260 hitters.....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Wristpin

Are you implying that many will be blown up if this specific dog is retired?


71 posted on 11/28/2005 7:54:49 AM PST by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: AnAmericanMother

I think we're OK if we spell it the way the Schutzhund clubs spell it :~D


72 posted on 11/28/2005 7:55:53 AM PST by HairOfTheDog (Join the Hobbit Hole Troop Support - http://freeper.the-hobbit-hole.net/ 1,000 knives and counting!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

Possibly. One thing for sure if it is retired prematurely it won't be detecting IEDS.


73 posted on 11/28/2005 7:57:30 AM PST by Wristpin ( Varitek says to A-Rod: "We don't throw at .260 hitters.....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Ditto
The AF...glad you asked...

Odds are that this young lady will be shifted aside with scant attention for her future. Far too many of the severely wounded are soon forgotten by a thankful Government. Sad fact but it is true.

These forgotten people and their horror stories abound.

74 posted on 11/28/2005 7:57:49 AM PST by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Wristpin

Can you show that there is ~any~ shortage of bomb detection or any other working dog in the military? Or are you just gonna argue like this dog going home will lose us the war, on some myopic principle?


75 posted on 11/28/2005 8:01:06 AM PST by HairOfTheDog (Join the Hobbit Hole Troop Support - http://freeper.the-hobbit-hole.net/ 1,000 knives and counting!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Wristpin
So, you are saying you don't trust the judgment of Brig. Gen. Robert Holmes and Gen. Michael Moseley to make official decisions about the safety of the troops?
76 posted on 11/28/2005 8:01:23 AM PST by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: cynicom
Wristpin is not only 100% right, but he is right to post it on FR.

There's a good reason for the law mentioned in the article...

adopting a military war dog was prohibited by law until the dog reached retirement age because of the $18,000 training expense
.
Sentimentality and emotionalism have no place here.

Let the woman adopt the dog, yes -- but WAIT until he's saved other lives first, and is ready for retirement.

I help train seeing eye dogs. We keep the dogs from puppyhood until they're about a year and a half old -- then we have to give them up. Forever.

The Seeing Eye institute's rules against future contact with the dog are so strict, in fact, that puppy-raisers are not permitted to even know the name or address of the eventual recipient of the dog. Thank you letters from those recipients are channeled through the institute, and thoroughly censored to make sure we never find out where the dog is!

So we know ahead of time that even though we get very attached to the dog, we must be prepared to give it up for the good of others.

I'm sure military dog handlers are advised that they must adopt this attitude too -- no matter what. I admire this young woman for her service, but this is out of line.

77 posted on 11/28/2005 8:01:59 AM PST by shhrubbery! (Max Boot: Joe Wilson has sold more whoppers than Burger King)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie

I remember reading an article years ago about the hundreds of working dogs being destroyed when their handlers were shipped home from Vietnam. I can only imagine the effects this had on the soldiers that spent so much time over there with them.


78 posted on 11/28/2005 8:02:39 AM PST by NTW64
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog

Well, since the only thing my dog is likely to try to protect is her dinner (and probably not even that - she even lets the cats smouch out of her dish as long as they don't get too pushy), I think I'm safe.


79 posted on 11/28/2005 8:04:03 AM PST by AnAmericanMother (. . . Ministrix of ye Chace (recess appointment), TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: shhrubbery!

And you know that the dog's nose is ok after the explosion?


80 posted on 11/28/2005 8:04:30 AM PST by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-176 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson