Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Coyoteman; Quark2005

I was thinking of the type where the ToE would say....


Event A happened, then event B, then C, then D......


Where the CHANCES of A happening are W, (or DID happen)
B happening is X,
C is Y,
D=Z and so forth.




464 posted on 12/01/2005 11:09:12 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 456 | View Replies ]


To: Elsie
Event A happened, then event B, then C, then D......

The links I give examples where scientists do just that, but not in such a simple way...

In the case of radiometric dating, for example, several different isotopic dates are compared - they are then compared to give a statistical distribution of dates with a certain standard deviation - if the deviation is small enough, it can be said that a date is found within a good certainty (i.e. percentage error). If the dates don't converge upon a good certainty, the data can be said to not be good, and no certainty can be reached. What is never found, though, are out-of-sequence radiological dates that converge within a particular certainty showing a 1 million-year-old stratus containing a Mesozoic fossil, for example.

Examples abound, but one has to read the details of the research carefully to glean the nitty-gritty out of it.

467 posted on 12/01/2005 12:22:42 PM PST by Quark2005 (Science aims to elucidate. Pseudoscience aims to obfuscate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 464 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson