In fact, they seem to not be able to grasp the point that one cannot model probabilities with that many boundary conditions with any accuracy at all, and that one cannot look at statistics in hindsight with any meaning. This is basic statistics stuff, and creationists over and over and over again seem to be unable to grasp it, and what's more, want this kind of shoddy speculation to be taken seriously as science.
Then are there any 'statistics' that Evolution uses that can be proven to be accurate?
421 posted on 11/30/2005 5:54:23 AM PST by Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going....)