Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: All

Medical science is studying in utero genetic formation through hormonal imbalance or balance. Animal studies are being conducted and results are pointing to biological causation.

The original writer stated nature does not have abnormalities. This statement is incorrect - much of nature crosses gender lines when reproduction is not threatened.

The sexual organs of male/female are similar but situated in different areas of the body. Both male and female have nipples (unless an abnormality has occurred).

I am not promoting the gay culture, however the arguments that biological forces determine gender identity are getting stronger and stronger.

A choice can be determined by belief in religious doctrine of course.... but one cannot change their proclivity to gender preference.

Some can live with it, or choose to live with an identity at all.... and some have surgical change.....

But one's mind is something which religious belief will have to aim the appeal to.... because calling gender malfunction is not the sin any more than a hare lip or spina bifida or Down Syndrome...

There is a choice for the individual of course, but not a choice for gender ... only a choice for lifestyle.

The sin remains in how the accusers are going to formulate it.


236 posted on 11/26/2005 1:26:41 PM PST by imintrouble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies ]


To: imintrouble
I am not promoting the gay culture,...

No, you're just lying about it...

_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-

...however the arguments that biological forces determine gender identity are getting stronger and stronger.

No, it still takes a male and female to produce a baby.

_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-

The sexual organs of male/female are similar but situated in different areas of the body. Both male and female have nipples (unless an abnormality has occurred).

Nipples are not sexual organs you dope...

240 posted on 11/26/2005 1:45:13 PM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies ]

To: imintrouble

If homosexuality was inborn, there would be no former homosexuals. Nor would there be people (such as that female basketball player whose name escapes me) who stated clearly that she didn't used to be a "gay", but chose to be.

So, those two factors prove your position to be mere wishful thinking by homosexual apologists, and swallowed by people who have not done their homework.

Obviously people have different temptations. Some people are tempted by this, some by that. We all have the choice of whether to give in to our temptations (which, btw, strengthen such desires) or to not act on them - in effect, control our minds' desires. Which has the effect of weakening them. Some people seem like "born liars" but such people still have the option of not lying. And, by using the will* to avoid action on temptation, the illicit desires diminish in time, and often cease to even enter the mind after a while.

*There are other methods as well.


245 posted on 11/26/2005 2:07:58 PM PST by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson