Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New idea for Abortion Party: Aid the enemy(Ann Coulter)
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | November 24, 2005 | Ann Coulter

Posted on 11/24/2005 5:24:00 AM PST by Jacob Kell

In the Iraq war so far, the U.S. military has deposed a dictator who had already used weapons of mass destruction and would have used them again. As we now know, Saddam Hussein was working with al-Qaida and was trying to acquire long-range missiles from North Korea and enriched uranium from Niger.

Saddam is on trial. His psychopath sons are dead. We've captured or killed scores of foreign terrorists in Baghdad. Rape rooms and torture chambers are back in R. Kelly's Miami Beach mansion where they belong.

(Excerpt) Read more at worldnetdaily.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: anncoulter; assocrats; democrats; demoncats; demonrats; gadafi; gaddafi; gutlessasses; iraq; khadafi; khaddafi; kurds; lebanon; libya; manureheads; mylovelyann; opiraqifreedom; qadafi; qaddafi; surrenderparty; syria; terrorism; traitors; treasonousasses; waronterror; warwithiraq; zotocrats
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last
This is a more detailed version of the one that was posted recently. BTW, I'm sorry that I'm unable to post a pic of our favorite Conservative hottie.
1 posted on 11/24/2005 5:24:01 AM PST by Jacob Kell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jacob Kell
Rule #1


2 posted on 11/24/2005 5:28:21 AM PST by pageonetoo (You'll spot their posts soon enough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacob Kell

3 posted on 11/24/2005 5:28:32 AM PST by Syberyenta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacob Kell
...The Democrats are giving aid and comfort to the enemy for no purpose other than giving aid and comfort to the enemy. There is no plausible explanation for the Democrats' behavior other than that they long to see U.S. troops shot, humiliated, and driven from the field of battle.

They fill the airwaves with treason, but when called to vote on withdrawing troops, disavow their own public statements. These people are not only traitors, they are gutless traitors.

4 posted on 11/24/2005 5:31:00 AM PST by pageonetoo (You'll spot their posts soon enough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacob Kell

bttt


5 posted on 11/24/2005 5:38:06 AM PST by jdm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pageonetoo

If only we could actually charge them [war critics] with criminal conduct & put them on trial....


6 posted on 11/24/2005 5:38:37 AM PST by ExcursionGuy84 ("Jesus, Your Love takes my breath away.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: pageonetoo

Now I know why the Rats love Ann so much. (sarcasm)


7 posted on 11/24/2005 5:43:49 AM PST by Piquaboy (22 year veteran of the Army, Air Force and Navy, Pray for all our military .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jacob Kell

Ann Rocks!


8 posted on 11/24/2005 5:48:01 AM PST by SampleMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacob Kell
Whether or not there is any merit to the idea, calling for a troop withdrawal – or "redeployment," as liberals pointlessly distinguish

It's not even a "pointless" distinction, it's a semantic evasion used by the Rats.

In military lingo, "redeployment" technically and specifically means returning to the base from which a soldier was originally deployed to Iraq.

When you go to Iraq, you're "deployed". When you come back to the U.S., you're being "redeployed". Murtha gave the impression that "redeployment" means "rearrangement" in the Middle Eastern theatre, which it most certainly does not.

Bui Tin, a former colonel in the North Vietnamese army, called the American peace movement "essential" to the North Vietnamese victory.

No mere colonel, Bui Tin personally received the surrender of the South Vietnamese government at the Presidential Palace in Saigon on April 30, 1975. So he knows what he's talking about.

9 posted on 11/24/2005 5:51:59 AM PST by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pageonetoo
I know a lot of people don't care for her style, but I love it.

She does, however, need to have children. I volunteer.


10 posted on 11/24/2005 5:52:07 AM PST by bill1952 ("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: pageonetoo
"...The Democrats are giving aid and comfort to the enemy for no purpose other than giving aid and comfort to the enemy. There is no plausible explanation for the Democrats' behavior other than that they long to see U.S. troops shot, humiliated, and driven from the field of battle."

I would only tweak this by adding, '...as a way to get back at George Bush and regain their majority in congress.'

11 posted on 11/24/2005 5:56:54 AM PST by rvoitier ("Hug your babies tight"--Luanne Platter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: pageonetoo

Hubba Hubba Hubba


12 posted on 11/24/2005 5:57:40 AM PST by beatnick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jacob Kell
Once again, What is good for America is bad for cut&run democrats. The rats have now positioned themselves to benefit politically only if we lose.
13 posted on 11/24/2005 6:04:49 AM PST by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacob Kell

Ann Coulter:


THE


TOTAL


PACKAGE


14 posted on 11/24/2005 6:10:19 AM PST by TheRobb7 (The American Spirit does not require a federal subsidy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacob Kell

As my lovely Ann correctly points out, the Assocrats loudly demand that the troops be pulled from Iraq, and then they vote against their own demands. Now that has to be somewhay dismaying to the terrorists and the Sheehadis.


15 posted on 11/24/2005 6:12:13 AM PST by Enterprise (The modern Democrat Party - a toxic stew of mental illness, cultism, and organized crime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pageonetoo
These people are not only traitors, they are gutless traitors.

Make it "Guiltless traitors". They seem to totally lack any conscience, which is the first requisite of feeling guilty. Since they cannot see the error of their ways, they are without guilt, therefore guiltless.

They are still traitors.

16 posted on 11/24/2005 6:35:09 AM PST by alloysteel (Payback and reality may not be related, but they can both be a b*tch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: pageonetoo

A Concealed Carry Permit would be useless in that outfit Ann.


17 posted on 11/24/2005 6:35:57 AM PST by WideGlide (That light at the end of the tunnel might be a muzzle flash.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rvoitier
I would only tweak this by adding, '...as a way to get back at George Bush and regain their majority in congress.'

Wrong. It is an "attempt" to regain their majority. I do not believe the American people are that stupid, and that these attempts are not that transparent.

In one thread, I read that MO voter rolls are to be purged. That is the best way to rid us of the Dims. They have been allowed to run things so long, that they have institutionalized their criminal behaviors. Unfortunately, we have a bunch of RINO's who go along with them, or lack the spine to fight.

It is up to those of us on the bottom, to find able attorneys, and get these things purged everywhere. We need to do away with "motor voter" and other supercilious means to cheat the system, and see those who continue their crimes prosecuted and jailed.

Once those things are started, we can work on getting rid of the pansies and abortionists, who are taking our youth down their perverse paths...

18 posted on 11/24/2005 6:36:40 AM PST by pageonetoo (You'll spot their posts soon enough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Jacob Kell
This is a more detailed version of the one that was posted recently.

What does that mean?

Try this.

Complete, not unnecessarily excerpted version, straight off Ann's web site.

19 posted on 11/24/2005 6:45:19 AM PST by upchuck (Mark Steyn: "...Democratic Party are a bunch of losers because they're all tactics and no strategy.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacob Kell
and the Palestinians are holding elections

There are no "Palestinians," Ann.

ML/NJ

20 posted on 11/24/2005 6:48:49 AM PST by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson