Can someone make sense of this?
To: BransonRevival
2 posted on
11/23/2005 10:36:38 AM PST by
RockinRight
(It’s likely for a Conservative to be a Republican, but not always the other way around)
To: Gipper08; traviskicks; JSDude1
To: BransonRevival; Torie
I see Dick Wadhams, has advised Allen to go after the Blue Collar Union vote in the Rust Belt and upper mid west where Free Trade is despised...
4 posted on
11/23/2005 10:42:05 AM PST by
GOPGuide
To: BransonRevival
In other words, sue for protection and get rewarded; keep your nose to the grindstone and get zilch. This is BS. If you are entitled by law to money that you fail to collect because you don't file the right paperwork, that's not "keeping your nose to the grindstone." It's missing the boat. Should foreign countries be allowed to flood our markets with artificially low priced goods?
6 posted on
11/23/2005 10:48:23 AM PST by
Huck
(Back from a brief timeout!)
To: BransonRevival
Its a political stunt, Allen is going to use it, if need be, in Virginia in case of an opponent, and also as ammo in the midwest for blue collar union votes.
His overall record is pro-free trade, so he can always try and pull a Kerry (nuance stuff) where he is pro-free trade but with something to show he isn't totally free trade.
Personally, its not smart politics, and makes him look like a flip flop without convictions.
7 posted on
11/23/2005 10:49:35 AM PST by
Sonny M
("oderint dum metuant")
To: BransonRevival; EDINVA; iceskater; xyz123; Mudboy Slim; Corin Stormhands; jla; Flora McDonald; ...
George Allen ping...........
12 posted on
11/23/2005 10:59:29 AM PST by
Gabz
To: BransonRevival
The Byrd Amendment allows U.S. companies to keep the profits from tariffs imposed by the U.S. government, instead of the money going to the U.S. Treasury. What that means is that the U.S. companies that successfully bring an anti-dumping action at your expense force you to pay higher prices for their products, while also keeping the revenue generated by the tariffs. In other words, from your standpoint, it's a lose-lose-lose.
36 posted on
11/23/2005 11:44:23 AM PST by
1rudeboy
To: BransonRevival
Not really. Maybe if I read it a few more times, do a few weeks of research and get educated …
40 posted on
11/23/2005 11:47:03 AM PST by
R. Scott
(Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
To: BransonRevival
Which side are Mr. Allen and his GOP colleagues on?
Not America
44 posted on
11/23/2005 12:10:25 PM PST by
cope85
To: BransonRevival
NGO are now controlling America
45 posted on
11/23/2005 12:14:41 PM PST by
cope85
To: BransonRevival
48 posted on
11/23/2005 12:31:16 PM PST by
cope85
To: BransonRevival; Corin Stormhands
Can someone make sense of this?This sounds like a job for
Corin Stormhands!!!!!
49 posted on
11/23/2005 12:36:54 PM PST by
P8riot
(When they come for your guns, give them the bullets first.)
To: BransonRevival
George, That's a good way to GAIN my vote.
78 posted on
11/23/2005 4:47:20 PM PST by
Dan from Michigan
("I got a shotgun and a rifle and a four wheel drive and a country boy can survive")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson