Skip to comments.
A Sad Display By OSU
The Daily Oklahoman ^
| 11-21-2005
| Tamara Colbert Maschino
Posted on 11/23/2005 8:26:13 AM PST by Osage Orange
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
To: Osage Orange
Thank a liberal or a nanny stater.
2
posted on
11/23/2005 8:28:44 AM PST
by
CSM
(When laws are written, they apply to ALL...Not just the yucky people you don't like. - HairOfTheDog)
To: Osage Orange
Every time I see something done for "the public good," I cringe. It means that someone is profiting at the expense of other individuals using the government as a weapon to do so.
3
posted on
11/23/2005 8:29:19 AM PST
by
peyton randolph
(Warning! It is illegal to fatwah a camel in all 50 states)
To: Osage Orange
Instead of wailing the residents and their families should be organizing. It would take a lot of guts to stand these POS off and the usual threats and bullying that have become synonymous with government but like the Klamath farmers there is strength in numbers and the university slime loath adverse publicity.
To: CSM
Thank the SCOTUS! We are hearing about more and more of these acquisitions since they ruled on the Connecticut case. Disgusting!
5
posted on
11/23/2005 8:33:34 AM PST
by
alice_in_bubbaland
(New Jersey gets the corrupt government it deserves!)
Comment #6 Removed by Moderator
To: robowombat
They are organizing, at least from what I've heard on local news. It does no good to organize, though, without getting the word out, and that means going public with their woes. In my opinion, these are NOT "whiners," but people who want to be left alone in their homes. I'm furious with OSU.
7
posted on
11/23/2005 8:35:27 AM PST
by
MizSterious
(Anonymous sources often means "the voices in my head told me.")
To: PhiKapMom
8
posted on
11/23/2005 8:35:51 AM PST
by
NonValueAdded
(CNN: I dub thee Richard X)
To: alice_in_bubbaland
Isn't Sandra Day O'Connor from Ok. I bet you her homestead is not in jeopardy from Kelo. I pray daily to keep Chief Justice Roberts and Candidate Alito wholesome from the creeping rot in DC.
9
posted on
11/23/2005 8:43:21 AM PST
by
Calusa
(Say Nick, was ya ever stung by a dead bee?)
To: bobbdobbs
Perhaps Grandma didn't realise that any homes had been previously taken in this manner. I hate the Eminent Domain right. She has lived in this home for 56 years. I don't believe it's right to take it, even if they pay her fair market value. Why work all your life for your piece of the American Dream when, in your golden years, it can be taken from you so easily? Very sad commentary on the state of our culture today.
10
posted on
11/23/2005 8:45:00 AM PST
by
originalbuckeye
(Often out of periods of losing come the greatest strivings toward a new winning streak-Mr.Rogers)
To: Calusa
Isn't Sandra Day O'Connor from Ok. No. She's from Arizona.
To: Osage Orange
"...assist them in acquiring land, and improvements for the proposed Master Plan, expansion of the existing campus."And therein lies the warning to us all. Until there are constitutional protections, anyone with property within bulldozer distance from a public or quasi-public facility had best pay attention to the planning process and raise their objections early. For example, I wonder for how many years was this neighborhood targeted in this plan or previous versions? Conversely, if the plan was recently altered, you might find the basis to object to the taking by asking why was it changed?
12
posted on
11/23/2005 8:47:30 AM PST
by
NonValueAdded
(CNN: I dub thee Richard X)
To: robowombat
Not sure I'd call it "wailing". LOL!!
I tend to think that those effected have organized...and this letter was just part of the process.
I could be wrong....and will try and follow this story.
FWIW-
13
posted on
11/23/2005 8:51:12 AM PST
by
Osage Orange
(A man who carries a cat by the tail learns something he can learn in no other way. -M. Twain)
To: Osage Orange
As popular as it has become to be outraged by eminent domain, there does exist occasions when it is either necessary, or meets the criteria established locally.
Construction of freeways, or airports and even schools are often legitimate reasons for eminent domain.
But the use of e.d. for a private development (as in Conneticutt) is not. This case seems to combine questionable tactics and methodology with what may or may not be a legitimate use of e.d. But anyone who lives near a major University should be aware that expansion is highly probable.
14
posted on
11/23/2005 8:51:56 AM PST
by
Michael.SF.
(The other side (in war on terror) is not evil--they just have a different perspective-Chris Mathews)
To: MizSterious
15
posted on
11/23/2005 8:52:43 AM PST
by
Osage Orange
(A man who carries a cat by the tail learns something he can learn in no other way. -M. Twain)
To: alice_in_bubbaland
Yes, thank SCOTUS. For returning this issue back to where it belonged. The states. The 5th Amendment, nor any of the Amendments were meant to be incorporated. The original intent of the Constitution is that the Bill of Rights applied to the federal government
only. This issue was intended to be, and should be, addressed by the respective state legislatures.
Of course that's an originalist POV, not a Republican or Democrat one.
16
posted on
11/23/2005 8:54:37 AM PST
by
billbears
(Deo Vindice)
To: Osage Orange
There is PLENTY of open, empty land around Stillwater for the dorks running the university to build anything they want, sports facilities included.
Since when do OSU athletics justify eminent domain anyway? Didn't they just modify their rickety stadium and Gallagher Iba Arena? Is T. Boone Pickens behind all this???
This news steams me.
17
posted on
11/23/2005 8:55:12 AM PST
by
Puddleglum
(Thank God the Boston blowhard lost)
To: Osage Orange
I wouldn't move. Put an old woman out of her home? Let them try. I personally would not budge. This is NOT America this is SOCIALISM. Plain and simple. Follow the $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
18
posted on
11/23/2005 8:56:51 AM PST
by
cubreporter
(I trust Rush. He's done more for our country than we will ever know. He's the man!)
To: Calusa
Isn't Sandra Day O'Connor from Ok. I bet you her homestead is not in jeopardy from Kelo. She dissented in that case. Check your facts.
19
posted on
11/23/2005 8:57:31 AM PST
by
Skylab
To: Michael.SF.
As popular as it has become to be outraged by eminent domain, there does exist occasions when it is either necessary, or meets the criteria established locally. Construction of freeways, or airports and even schools are often legitimate reasons for eminent domain.Sure...I can agree with that. But...it should be done fairly...and it should be done rarely.
But the use of e.d. for a private development (as in Conneticutt) is not. This case seems to combine questionable tactics and methodology with what may or may not be a legitimate use of e.d. But anyone who lives near a major University should be aware that expansion is highly probable.
For crying out loud, it's not for a research lab to cure DemoMarxistLeftishSocialistLiberalism..It's for a sports complex.
20
posted on
11/23/2005 8:59:12 AM PST
by
Osage Orange
(A man who carries a cat by the tail learns something he can learn in no other way. -M. Twain)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson