Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: defenderSD
Oh man, I wished you were correct, the recent years of military analysis of the Chinese amphibious capabilities proves you to be in error. Not to mention the massive buildup of surface to surface missiles aimed at Taiwan's infrastructure, continuing covert operations on the island by Chinese agents to ensure sabotage to help facilitate the destruction of Taiwan's infrastructure and assassination of it's political leaders.

Dig deeper and I think you'll be surprised at what you'll find concerning China's up coming Navy, missile tech, amphibious attack modernization.
72 posted on 11/22/2005 9:19:31 PM PST by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]


To: servantboy777
Dig deeper and I think you'll be surprised at what you'll find concerning China's up coming Navy, missile tech, amphibious attack modernization.

I'm completely familiar with the constant stream of pants-wetting panicky articles about the PLA military from the militarily uneducated and those with various axes to grind (biggest source: WingNutDaily) that regularly pollute FR, believe me.

Sadly, it seems you've bought them hook, line, and sinker.

75 posted on 11/22/2005 9:25:21 PM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

To: servantboy777

Show me the "military analysis" which you reference in post #72. Do you know what the term JDAM means? How about the term joint standoff weapon?


77 posted on 11/22/2005 9:27:52 PM PST by defenderSD (What do Bush, Blair, Aznar, and Berlusconi know about Saddam's regime that Democrats don't know?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson