" Your source is biased, thus, totally disqualified."
Just like that? It doesn't matter if the site is biased; what matters is the substance of the arguments put forth. Creationist sites are equally biased against evolution (and much of science in general). In order to debate them though, we still have to argue their points. We do. You apparently don't feel the need to make substantive arguments against evolutionists; just saying they are biased against creationism is enough for you. It isn't for us. If you have a disagreement with a claim made on Talk Origins, make it. Hand waving it away makes you look afraid to address the substance of the issue.
I guess you haven't been around here very long. Your "evo-leadership" has previously and automatically dismissed any and all info from sites that defend creation because they were "biased", but never disclosed the fact that their reference sites are equally "biased".
So, thank you for making my point and further discrediting your "leadership". I happen to agree with you, at least the point you made that I quoted here.
Again, thanks! That's all I wanted to accomplish.