Replies

[Will someone please show me any type of physical evidence that ID is correct. (Evidence that Natural Selection is incorrect does not explicitly support ID. Just because "A" is wrong does not mean "B" is correct.)]

Ogre, no one is asking you darwinists to believe anything. All the ID folks are asking is for "equal time". Get it.

You'll get "equal time" when you have "equal evidence". Get *THAT*?

Move over and quite blocking the aisle.

Stop whining that you have nothing to actually present.

Intelligent Design has every bit as much or more credibility than has darwinism.

ROFL!!!!!!

Intelligent Design has every bit as much or more credibility than has darwinism.

First of all, there is no "darwinism" and if there was it would be capitalized.

You'll get "equal time" when you have "equal evidence". Get *THAT*?

Yes I get that crystal clear. ID has a way to go to match up with fossils and DNA and the host of other evidence directly supporting Natural Selection. When ID has "equal evidence" it deserves equal time. That is not the case here in late 2005.

In the scientific world credibility is gained through evidence, experimentation, and peer review. Please state your evidence, experimentation, and/or peer review of the previous ID "science". On it's own merits, ID has no credibility as a scientific theory whatsoever.