They are resilient popular culture images that celebrate and glorify weapons, killing, and violence, laying the groundwork for the perpetuation of attitudes of domination, power, and control.
On second thought, they may be onto something here...
They are resilient popular culture images that celebrate and glorify weapons, killing, and violence, laying the groundwork for the perpetuation of attitudes of domination, power, and control.
On second thought, they may be onto something here...
I've got to mark this thread for reading this evening. I've no doubts FREEP humor will be in very high form. ;)
mark
Read later
ack - barf alert?
I don't hunt, but this theory is hysterical. Does this mean that woman who hunt are lesbians- frustrated self hating, lesbians or that they are just better at math?
"Three female Michigan State University professors studied the magazine "Traditional Bowhunter," and concluded that hunting is a form of sexual violence with animals substituted for women. "
I think women who equate hunting with sexual violence against women are women who are sexually unstafied for one reason or another and are projecting their psychosis onto other practices and objects.
They may subconsciously equate a maculine hunter with the kind of real man they would like as a companion instead of the gurly-men who typically inhabit college campuses.
OK. Here's a study: university professors hide behind credentials earned through kissing serious a$$ in order to preach to people and indoctrinate youth into their own belief sets. Using paper as a pseudonym for violent acts, they propound theories antithetical to mainstream society in order to capture influence and drive financial markets. Using regression analysis, professors hunt prey with equations and rig the quarry with their mindsets, flunking or dismissing all those who disagree with them.
Anyone who doesn't have credentials may not participate in the debate, and, is therefore dead to university professors.
Funding needs to be investigated for these theses.
Great big honking, barking, raving moonbat warning!
And not like that, either!
"Absent from this study is where the millions of female hunters fit for that is the only logical conclusion of the animal-is-a-woman and woman-is-an-animal thesis. Not far removed from their illation would be to say women obtain sexual gratification from hunting but actually wish they were sexually abusing women, or maybe themselves."
I confess! I confess! If nothing's going on in the field while I'm waiting for a deer to walk by my deerstand I "abuse" myself...I'm so ashamed! *Rolleyes*
What a load of deer poop. These people are absolutely insane.
We hear this crap every few years as a "new"study and it is the same as before, some man hating/fearing feminist supposing. Whatever man does that a woman doesn't do as much is "sexual violence" or substitutes for sexual predation.
Three women in Michigan who can't get laid!