Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Young Scholar
But the point of executive pay is really to hold on to executives who are still valuable to the company, and it should be based on what is necessary to keep him there as long as the value he provides is greater than the cost.

Too often used by shills and whores. I'd gladly run GM into the ground just as much as these clowns for a mere "pennies on the dollar" of what they're getting paid. And Carly Fiorina destroyed tens of billions of shareholder value at Lucent and HP, but still walked away with a seven-figure severance package...

284 posted on 11/22/2005 5:21:09 AM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | View Replies ]


To: grey_whiskers
Too often used by shills and whores. I'd gladly run GM into the ground just as much as these clowns for a mere "pennies on the dollar" of what they're getting paid. And Carly Fiorina destroyed tens of billions of shareholder value at Lucent and HP, but still walked away with a seven-figure severance package...

Very true, and it is unfortunate when it happens. At times it may be the result of nepotism and favoritism leading to bad hiring decisions, but at times I suspect it is just a bad gamble. There's a reason someone like Fiorina got to where she was--she obviously has some significant talent. In retrospect, through, she was very ill-suited to a company like HP, and probably not worth what they paid her. On the other hand, a company that never took management risks and always hired "bargain" executives would probably do even worse in the long run.

295 posted on 11/22/2005 7:09:01 AM PST by Young Scholar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 284 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson