Awwww, whatsa matter Nancy, did the Republicans pull one over on the RATS? Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't Harry just do the same thing when he called the Senate into a closed door meeting?
Pelosi said that the "Republican majority has stooped to a new low" by forcing Democrats to go on the record against an immediate pullout.
IF the Republicans hit a "new low" they still haven't caught up with the lows the RAT Party has sunk to.
I think it was GREAT! The Dims pooped on the floor and the Republicans pushed their nose in it. BAD DOG! BAD DOG!
We might house train them yet.
What a hypocritic bitch...
Nancy Pelosi is a disgrace
Harry Reid admits he didn't read the pre war intelligence reports prepared by the CIA specifically at the request of Democrats.
Rockefeller says that only six Senators read the prewar intel reports.
Even though it sounds like our side didn't read the reports, they aren't the ones now complaining the intelligence was manipulated.
How can the left make an informed judgement the intelligence was manipulated if they never saw the intelligence?
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1524569/posts
Hopefully the Republicans can get as "low" as the demorats. The demorats have been holding the low road far to long by themselves.
How did we force them? Any Democrat who doesn't vote his conscience but would rather keep his paycheck should resign, Nancy. Don't beef at us.
Nancy Pelosi?
Oh you mean Nancy "D'Alesandro" Pelosi - mafia scion.
Those Dems really know how to attract creeps don't they?
So, I see, closing the Senate to grandstand about "corrupted Intelligence" isn't a stunt, but calling for a vote on whether to withdraw from Iraq is?
Donks, like most liars and criminals, don't like to get nailed down with hard evidence.
In other words, Nancy is mad because the Republicans effectively took away the ability for the Democrats to play political games.
They will be spinning this one forever.
Nancy, why is it a disgrace for members of Congress to officially state that they support our military during wartime?
Pelosi has no principles. Why didn't she reject it herself if she felt so strongly about it?
Apparently, the Democratic members of Congress have figured out that their constituents are so uninformed and/or stupid that the Dems can get away with any statement they want.
403 to 3. The "Sound and Fury, Signifying Nothing" Democrats.
by Hugh Hewitt
November 19, 2005 05:49 AM PST
The Murtha proposal for immediate withdrawal from Iraq was defeated 403 to 3 last night. So much for the idea of cut and run.
Many Democrats were emotionally undone by the exercise of having to confront their own rhetoric, and the anti-war left must be stunned this morning: Only three votes? All that work? All those marches? All those posts at the fever swamp bulletin board? For three votes?
The Dems have more excuses than a teenager: It wasn't the real Murtha resolution; it's a terrible political trick; I will not participate in the assault on Congressman Murtha etc, etc, etc.
But the talk around the turkey this week should review that the elections in 2002, 2004 and the vote on Friday night in the House underscore the county is committed to victory in Iraq, in Afghanistan, and everywhere else the GWOT is being waged. That talk should also dwell on the profound hypocrisy of the left and its Congressional representatives, "full of sound and fury, signifying nothing." They only believe what they believe when the country as a whole isn't watching. Supermen on the web, when Congress assmebled they went into their phonebooths/cloakrooms and came out as Clark Kent.
The Democrats took their walloping last year and instead of resolving to return to D.C. as an opposition party that would work to craft alternatives to domestic policies while remaining supportive of the GWOT and of the troops, have spent a year digging deeper and deeper into anti-war conspiracy theories and committing themselves to Vietnam Syndrome 2.0. The GOP abetted their descent by failing to do what happened yesterday: Call them on their nonsense and debate it, in full view of the public, and not in MSM-mediated soundbytes.
The Chamber was full and the tempers high --as they should be when a great party confronts its opposite over a serious issue. The Democratic Party is committed to retreat, but they hate to be asked to defend that inclination. The Republicans are committed to victory, but seem hesitant because of the high costs of the war, even though the costs of retreat would be much higher still.
If the GOP stays the course of clarity, and keeps its purposes front and center, the elections of 2006 will be another milestone in the Democrats road to Whigdom.
Win the war.
Confirm the judges.
Cut the taxes.
Control the spending.
Ouch, Nancy! Take that and put some ice on it. You guys are a pitiful sight.
(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie.Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")
I would really like to see someone grab that bitch and push her face in dog droppings(Great Dane size)... I cannot believe a single person listens to her.
So, is the little old broad from California so disgraced that she's going to "immediately withdraw" from the House?
