[ElkGroveDan]

Well isn't that just peachy? He's a strong leader. I can't wait for him to use his "strength" to sign gun control legislation and appoint pro-abortion judges and speak out against the marriage amendment.

The both of you need to go back to politics 101 and find out why people become political. If you do it just to win, you should probably stick to cheering for your favorite baseball team and quit mucking up the GOP. The rest of us are interested in the policy outcomes of elections. It does no good for conservatives to support liberals, period.

[Mia T]

You've ignored the 2nd part of my answer. Giuliani wins because he has the qualities we need during these dangerous times.

I am willing to give up my parochial wants in this time of crisis. I think most people are. It seems you are not.

The question you must ask yourself is this: If sticking to your guns (pardon the pun) will result in electing ultra leftie and ultra danger President hillary clinton, will you stick to your guns?

[Luke21]

Thank you, Dan. I can't believe all the people here who are ready to cede the entire conservative agenda just to win.

If we know in advance we are going to have liberal abortion laws, gay rights, an assault on the second amendment, and no border enforcement, why in the would we want to elect such a person in the first place?

In New York City, maybe. There Pol Pot would be a reformer. But to ask the GOP as a whole to nominate somebody for president who agrees with the Democrats on most major issues is nuts.