To: Conservative Canuck
Sorry, but if this story has substance, the MSM would have covered it, even though it would have pained them to do so. It's too big a story to pass by regardless of how much they hate Bush.
12 posted on
11/18/2005 2:24:58 PM PST by
CALawyer
To: CALawyer
I agree. Plus it looks a little fishy when everyone here talks about how incompetent the UN and inspections are and then tries to use their committees' reports as evidence to prove their point.
To: CALawyer
15 posted on
11/18/2005 2:29:27 PM PST by
Rippin
To: CALawyer
Sorry but the MSM covers whatever it wants whatever way it wants,and then drops the subject if it does not fit their scenarios.
I remember during the campaign the MSM frenzy over the US military supposed failure to secure tons and tons of highly sophisticated explosives during the invasion. And then the story vanished because it did not fit the "war for oil" "Bush war" script.BUt BUt But If there were tons of highly sophisticated explosives then Saddam was obviously a threat.... What to do.. How to spin this...MSM just decided to stop talking about it.
To: CALawyer; Admin Moderator
Welcome to Free Republic.
/john
30 posted on
11/18/2005 3:51:34 PM PST by
JRandomFreeper
(D@mit! I'm just a cook. Don't make me come over there and prove it!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson