[jwalsh07]

If CSPAN had an honest bone in their collective bodies, every issue would have two lines, pro or con. If they use the wrong line they get hung up on. They can identify themselves however they want but they have to adhere to pro or con.

Of course that doesn't sit well with CSPAN's agenda I suppose.

[Dane]

If CSPAN had an honest bone in their collective bodies, every issue would have two lines, pro or con.

The seminar democrat callers could still call and say, I'm a Republican but I'm against what they are doing blah, blah, blah.

[A CA Guy]

You make an excellent point, they are trying to make a party issue out of this, but there is no way to substantiate who people are, at least with a pro and con you can establish a caller's view. That should be enough and I would suggest you make your suggestion known to Cspan. I think that was a very intelligent observation on your part, BRAVO!