[RobbyS]

It has been confused with creationism which IS a religious doctrine. It is also not a "god of the gaps" notion. Properly speaking it is that the evolutionary mechanism proposed by Darwin, even as updated by neo-darwinists, does not explain the evidence.

[Physicist]

It has been confused with creationism which IS a religious doctrine. It is also not a "god of the gaps" notion. Properly speaking it is that the evolutionary mechanism proposed by Darwin, even as updated by neo-darwinists, does not explain the evidence.

So theory intelligent design is simply the idea that Darwinism is wrong?

[donh]

Properly speaking it is that the evolutionary mechanism proposed by Darwin, even as updated by neo-darwinists, does not explain the evidence.

Really? Than why isn't it called gap-give-up-ism, rather than intelligent design?