His son's doing little better by spitting on those who put him in office expecting controlled spending, border control and other *conservative* policies rather than empty rhetoric mismatched with *liberal* actions.
Should the Dem, worse if it's Hillary, win in 2008 will be largely of his making because good people will either find another candidate or simply not participate in another Republican fraud.
Perot started the Perot movement.
The people who followed him were not used as the pawns they were by Perot who had a personal problem of some kind against the Bush's.
Democrats benefited as they always do when anyone votes for a third party candidates in the actual elections. Or as I call it, the throw away vote!
It seems to always end up being passive enabling of the Democrat party in the very least.
Hopefully they learned their lesson, you try to make changes in the primary, then go Republican in the general election.