Skip to comments.
Teacher Sacked for Screening Elizabeth
The Guardian ^
| November 17, 2005
| Staff and agencies
Posted on 11/17/2005 11:52:03 AM PST by HostileTerritory
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-83 next last
The students seem unhappy.
To: HostileTerritory
The guy lacks some serious common sense.
2
posted on
11/17/2005 11:53:13 AM PST
by
Sonny M
("oderint dum metuant")
To: HostileTerritory
I think it is stupid for anyone to raise an issue about this. I understand 'procedure', but to force someone to resign? Come 'on! These students are 17 and 18 year old HONORS students. It's not like he showed Fast Times at Ridgemont High or anything. Talk about over reacting.
3
posted on
11/17/2005 11:54:49 AM PST
by
sandbar
To: HostileTerritory
smattering of violet and sexual scenes
If only they had used purple scenes instead...
4
posted on
11/17/2005 11:56:49 AM PST
by
Ragnorak
To: HostileTerritory
It was a great movie. Cate Blanchett was robbed of the Oscar. Instead it went to that "gawky bird" Paltrow.
5
posted on
11/17/2005 11:58:49 AM PST
by
elc
To: sandbar
How about this issue: why are students in an honors British Lit class watching a movie to begin with, much less a highly fictionalized account of Elizabeth. Maybe a film of Shakespeare, but why are movies being shown so often now. I have a nephew who claims that his History class watches at least 1 film per week over 2 days. This is absurd. Teachers showing movies are just too lazy to teach and producing dopes.
6
posted on
11/17/2005 11:59:06 AM PST
by
usafsk
((Know what you're talking about before you dance the QWERTY waltz))
To: HostileTerritory
Those in charge of the credits have also been sacked.
7
posted on
11/17/2005 11:59:11 AM PST
by
rightinthemiddle
(#1 Rule in Dealing with the Media, Democrats and Terrorists: Can't Please 'Em, so Don't Appease 'Em.)
To: HostileTerritory
I bet every single one of those kids has seen "Sex in the City" and "Will and Grace."
PC kills.
8
posted on
11/17/2005 12:00:12 PM PST
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Islam Factoid:After forcing young girls to watch his men execute their fathers, Muhammad raped them.)
To: sandbar
I agree. And that film is magnificent.
To: HostileTerritory
Why does the Guardian newspaper care about what happens to a schoolteacher in Atlanta, Georgia? Because it involves a British literature class and Elizabeth I?
To: rightinthemiddle
11
posted on
11/17/2005 12:01:56 PM PST
by
ArrogantBustard
(Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
To: HostileTerritory
It's a pretty good film, but belongs in a history class rather than a literature class. He should have shown Shakespeare in Love if he wanted something from the period that had a literary angle.
In any case, I guess he should have sent home some sort of permission slip, though it is hardly any worse than anything teens watch on the WB.
12
posted on
11/17/2005 12:01:59 PM PST
by
Sans-Culotte
(Meadows Place, TX-"Tom DeLay Country")
To: usafsk
I agree that kids watch too many movies in high school, but I'm willing to make an exception for this one. It's excellent--fiction, yes, but if these are honors students, they know that already. They can and should enjoy it for whatever it renders.
To: marsh_of_mists
I'm sure they love stories that enable them to look down their noses at us and laugh. This is exactly the type of story that Europeans (and Brits) love because they have different standards about what teenagers can watch.
To: Sans-Culotte
He should have shown Shakespeare in Love What, and bore them to death?
15
posted on
11/17/2005 12:03:15 PM PST
by
dfwgator
To: usafsk
How about this issue: why are students in an honors British Lit class watching a movie to begin with, much less a highly fictionalized account of Elizabeth. Maybe a film of Shakespeare, but why are movies being shown so often now. I have a nephew who claims that his History class watches at least 1 film per week over 2 days. This is absurd. Teachers showing movies are just too lazy to teach and producing dopes.I was going to post with the same observation. You have nailed the problem.
To: Sans-Culotte
It's a pretty good film, but belongs in a history class rather than a literature class. He should have shown Shakespeare in Love if he wanted something from the period that had a literary angle. To be fair, we don't know what literature he had recently assigned or what the kids were reading at the time.
To: rightinthemiddle
The directors of the firm hired to continue the credits after the other people had been sacked, wish it to be known that they have just been sacked. The credits have been completed in an entirely different style at great expense and at the last minute.
18
posted on
11/17/2005 12:05:40 PM PST
by
pogo101
To: HostileTerritory
They showed "Schindler's List" last year here to 8th graders. There wasn't a fuss about that movie.
19
posted on
11/17/2005 12:06:05 PM PST
by
mtbopfuyn
(Legality does not dictate morality... Lavin)
To: usafsk
i know when i was in HS - we used to watch the accompanying movie to the novel in my AP classes. Our assignment afterwards was to critique the movie for how closely it followed the novel, as well as how it handled the symbolism, etc... It was good - it demonstrated how well we understood the novel and how closely we could pay attention... if handled correctly - this can be a benefit.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-83 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson