Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
To: Reagan Man
Looks like Murtha has let his partisanship overcome his patriotism. But he's not the first Vietnam vet to against our nation and our troops in the field.
2 posted on
11/17/2005 9:15:10 AM PST by
TheDon
(The Democratic Party is the party of TREASON!)
To: Reagan Man
Murtha is a close adviser to House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D- Calif. Says it all.
3 posted on
11/17/2005 9:15:11 AM PST by
A message
To: Reagan Man
Pelosi made him an offer he couldn't refuse.
To: Reagan Man
Murtha joins the defeat brigade. May his name be held in contempt forever for dealing a defeat to his country.
5 posted on
11/17/2005 9:16:29 AM PST by
Rapscallion
(They're not Anericans; they're democrats.)
To: Reagan Man
Thirty years in Congress is way too long.
These once proud Americans get the later in life, Barry Goldwater disease.

6 posted on
11/17/2005 9:16:32 AM PST by
G.Mason
(The U.S. has two political party's ... Diseased Democrats and Republicans in pink chiffon)
To: Reagan Man
"At times during his remarks to reporters, the decorated Vietnam War veteran was choking back tears." Uh oh....someone has his FBI file.....
7 posted on
11/17/2005 9:17:30 AM PST by
goodnesswins
(DEMS....40 yrs and $$$dollars for the War on Poverty, but NOT a $$ or minute for the WAR on Terror!)
To: Reagan Man
The sky is falling! The war is failing! The administration is imcompetent! Pelosi stomped on my toe!...........
8 posted on
11/17/2005 9:17:53 AM PST by
Red Badger
(United States Marine Corps, Saving France's Bacon Since 1775.............)
To: Reagan Man
Pull Out?!??
Doesn't sound manly to me!
11 posted on
11/17/2005 9:20:45 AM PST by
Paloma_55
(Which part of "Common Sense" do you not understand???)
To: Reagan Man
This man, Mr. Murtha, is a coward and a defeatist. It figures he is a Democrat.
Putz.
13 posted on
11/17/2005 9:21:34 AM PST by
RexBeach
("The rest of the world is three drinks behind." -Humphrey Bogart)
To: Reagan Man
We WANT our military to be the target, to flush out and kill the enemy.
Otherwise, we'll be picking our dead civilian bodies out of the rubble -- on September 11, 2001 over 72 police officers were killed. More than our military has lost in any single day fighting the terrorists in Iraq.
We are winning the war on terror. But every day we fight is another day we will lose a few more men.
Murtha says our country can't afford or stomach having 7 dead marines in a day in the war on terror. He is wrong, he underestimates the american people, the resolve of our military, and the clear lesson of history.
If we pull out because of 2000 deaths in 2 years, you can be sure there will be thousands more dead wherever else our troops are found.
Murtha's crying fake tears, he has been co-opted by the radical left which now owns his party.
To: Reagan Man
What a whack job. Can someone please write a story that actually analyzes what is RIGHT and SENSIBLE to do? rather than nonsense about "disenchantment"? We live in a real world, Iraq is a strategically placed ally now. It could not possibly make sense to abandon them to terrorists.
This guy can cry all he wants, keep his damn hands off my country's foreign policy.
15 posted on
11/17/2005 9:22:08 AM PST by
Williams
To: Reagan Man
I wish General Patton had been there to smack the Congressman across his sniveling jowl.
16 posted on
11/17/2005 9:22:59 AM PST by
silverleaf
(Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
To: Reagan Man
"one of Congress' most hawkish Democrats."
That speaks volumes doesn't it? Their biggest "hawk" wants to abandon our ally and pull out to turn the Mideast over to terrorists in the middle of a war that frankly isn't experiencing a high rate of casualties.
17 posted on
11/17/2005 9:24:31 AM PST by
Williams
To: Reagan Man
BTW, secret CIA prisons are not directly related to the war in Iraq, and have nothing to do with our troops being there or not.
Unless Murtha is going to say that we should also stop rounding up terrorists and imprisoning them.
Maybe we should give them "work" visas for them to come over here and do "their work" of annialating us.
Hey, we are winning. By pushing back the lies of the democrats, we have forced their hand. Now we have to be more resolute than the anti-war, anti-american left who wants nothing more than to lose the war and gain power.
When Cindy shows up in Texas, we need 50 people in FRONT of her with pro-USA signs. No more free publicity for the enemies of our country, for those who want to abandon our allies like they did in Vietnam.
To: Reagan Man
It is evident that continued military action in Iraq is not in the best interests of the United States of America, the Iraqi people or the Persian Gulf region," And a cut and run pullout would be? What a frickin idiot. Hang in there a little longer terrorists. The US congressional politicians will hand you the victory.
19 posted on
11/17/2005 9:25:31 AM PST by
paul51
(11 September 2001 - Never forget)
To: Reagan Man

YOU TELL 'EM TO PULLOUT, MURTHA.
NOW!
20 posted on
11/17/2005 9:25:56 AM PST by
polymuser
(")
To: Reagan Man
Redeployment
Enemies of the US will begin to use this word to mean surrender Iraq to the terrorists.
To: Reagan Man
He is forsaking our troops.
23 posted on
11/17/2005 9:27:47 AM PST by
tioga
To: Reagan Man
In other words "SURRENDER".
I am inclined to think that this is as simple as trying to pile on to the President while his polls are low.The dems know that the War on Terror will never be entrusted to them so they have to try to end it at any and all cost.
26 posted on
11/17/2005 9:31:53 AM PST by
carlr
To: Reagan Man
Actually the war is going as it was thought since we were involved with insane terrorist. But I see this, as we are winning and the accomplishments are numerous the RATS are afraid that two things will happen:
1. The war will come to a great conclusion with no more terrorist attacks than is happening around the globe. But more important the Iraqi Government will be in total control by 2006, and that scares the CRATS.
2. The recent documents captured in Iraq will show that Saddam had WMD, and they were removed and hidden. This are beginning to lean that way. One problem is I understand that the UN inspectors did not retain all the documents.
28 posted on
11/17/2005 9:36:32 AM PST by
Logical me
(Oh, well!!!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson