[RusIvan]

And I said, that Germans justified annexation of Sudetenland with the fact, that it was populated mainly by Germans. And such an annexation was accepted by France and UK in Munich.
So if they took Zaolzie (populated mainly by Poles), that "justification" would fail.==

Exactly lizol:). Then I understood you well after all:). So for germans this justification works on Sudeten region but for poles it works on Tishin(Zaozelie) region. Before same France and Britain and whole world to add:).

But I know, you're going to maintain anyway, that it was Polish-German co-operation.==

Cooperation according dictionary is mutual work for benefits maybe different for each involved party.

[lizol]

Where the f**k I wrote in these words, that I considered this "population issue" as sufficient justification for Poland's action????

Man, discussing with you reminds me of a dog trying to catch his own tail and spinning around himself to do so.

You're just like Stan Tyminski, a very populist Polish politician, emigree from Peru, who was a candidate during presidential election in 1990.
He was famous of avoiding getting into any substantial discussion or debate.

There was a joke about him relating to that:

"During a press conference a journalist is asking Stan Tyminski a question:
- "Mr. Tyminski, what could you say to out viewers about the idea of a flat tax, what's your opinion about it?

- And Tyminski replies: "Oh, yes, Poland is a very beautiful country, however I don't like snow".

So it's more or less like discussing with you.