Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CHENEY FIGHTS BACK
Drudge Report ^ | Nov. 16 2005 | Dick Cheney

Posted on 11/16/2005 4:05:19 PM PST by Oeconomicus

CHENEY FIGHTS BACK Wed Nov 16 2005 18:56:46 ET Excerpts As Prepared For Delivery Tonight by Vice President Cheney

THE VICE PRESIDENT: "As most of you know, I have spent a lot of years in public service, and first came to work in Washington, D.C. back in the late 1960s. I know what it’s like to operate in a highly charged political environment, in which the players on all sides of an issue feel passionately and speak forcefully.

In such an environment people sometimes lose their cool, and yet in Washington you can ordinarily rely on some basic measure of truthfulness and good faith in the conduct of political debate. But in the last several weeks we have seen a wild departure from that tradition.

And the suggestion that’s been made by some U. S. senators that the President of the United States or any member of this Administration purposely misled the American people on pre-war intelligence is one of the most dishonest and reprehensible charges ever aired in this city...

Some of the most irresponsible comments have, of course, come from politicians who actually voted in favor of authorizing force against Saddam Hussein. These are elected officials who had access to the intelligence, and were free to draw their own conclusions.

They arrived at the same judgment about Iraq’s capabilities and intentions that was made by this Administration and by the previous Administration. There was broad-based, bipartisan agreement that Saddam Hussein was a threat … that he had violated U.N. Security Council Resolutions … and that, in a post-9/11 world, we couldn’t afford to take the word of a dictator who had a history of WMD programs, who had excluded weapons inspectors, who had defied the demands of the international community, who had been designated an official state sponsor of terror, and who had committed mass murder.

Those are facts.

What we’re hearing now is some politicians contradicting their own statements and making a play for political advantage in the middle of a war. The saddest part is that our people in uniform have been subjected to these cynical and pernicious falsehoods day in and day out. American soldiers and Marines are out there every day in dangerous conditions and desert temperatures – conducting raids, training Iraqi forces, countering attacks, seizing weapons, and capturing killers – and back home a few opportunists are suggesting they were sent into battle for a lie.

The President and I cannot prevent certain politicians from losing their memory, or their backbone – but we’re not going to sit by and let them rewrite history.

We’re going to continue throwing their own words back at them. And far more important, we’re going to continue sending a consistent message to the men and women who are fighting the war on terror in Iraq, Afghanistan, and many other fronts.

We can never say enough how much we appreciate them, and how proud they make us. They and their families can be certain: That this cause is right … and the performance of our military has been brave and honorable … and this nation will stand behind our fighting forces with pride and without wavering until the day of victory.

Developing...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 109th; 229; cheney; draftdodger; gwot; iraq; iraqwar; iraqwmd; saddam; terrorism; waronterror; wmd; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 321-334 next last
To: Oeconomicus

GRrrrrreat!

Cheney is the BEST SPOKESPERSON for this Administration.

Remember the RPGs he used to throw at Kerry/Edwards last year?

I love him! God bless his heart.


241 posted on 11/16/2005 9:25:28 PM PST by indianrightwinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oeconomicus
We’re going to continue throwing their own words back at them.

Hell yeah.

242 posted on 11/16/2005 9:32:09 PM PST by T. Buzzard Trueblood (left unchecked, Saddam Hussein...will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons." Sen. Hillary Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: de Buillion

It's Dick and Lynne Cheney.


243 posted on 11/16/2005 9:32:28 PM PST by paulat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies]

To: double_down

OMG! Good for the VP! Setting the story straight and naming names!!

You go, sir!


244 posted on 11/16/2005 9:34:38 PM PST by Shortstop7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44

Done............thanks!


245 posted on 11/16/2005 9:44:40 PM PST by Shortstop7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: All

posting, so I can find my place in the morning.

This looks like a good effort on Cheney's part. I hope it works, but I am feeling pessimistic about our chances, friends. Too many only listen to "libsoundbites", and can't be bothered to think for themselves.

On that sad note, I am heading for bed.


246 posted on 11/16/2005 9:59:44 PM PST by jacquej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies]

To: Oeconomicus

TRANSCRIPT: http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2005/11/20051116-10.html


247 posted on 11/16/2005 10:03:18 PM PST by Ooh-Ah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marine_Uncle

I would truly hope this man, is not prefering Wyoming flies to stating Our Nation's purpose in War. If not- you can make post card sentiments a big hit- somwhere.


248 posted on 11/16/2005 10:11:16 PM PST by Treader (Hillary's dark smile is reminiscent of Stalin's inhuman grin...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: USMCPOP

You are an outstanding father, and we will do our best to honor your son's excellent memory.

God bless you and your family.


249 posted on 11/16/2005 10:12:17 PM PST by andie74 (A charter member of "Italians for Alito")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Treader
"I would truly hope this man, is not prefering Wyoming flies to stating Our Nation's purpose in War...."
If Americans do not understand the reasons we are now in phase two called the SASO (security and stabilization operation) after completing phase one, going to war with Iraq and removing his ability to wage war against his neighbors, and all the other things that have been elucidated in detail for some two years for all that are willing to listen, then it would appear he shouldn't bother trying to explain to empty heads once again why we went to war in Iraq.
Do have a pleasant day, I gotta hit the sack. Well past my bedtime.
250 posted on 11/16/2005 10:24:00 PM PST by Marine_Uncle (Honor must be earned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: TurnerBrown
OUR SIDE? After the attacks on Bush from the idiots that claim to be conservatives over Meirs, who is on our side? Certainly not those that forget we are fighting a war.
251 posted on 11/16/2005 10:25:01 PM PST by bybybill (remember, the fish come first)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: Oeconomicus; All
TRANSCRIPT of Cheney's speech
252 posted on 11/16/2005 10:25:53 PM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marine_Uncle

I agree. On the morrow,Marine Uncle...


253 posted on 11/16/2005 10:26:41 PM PST by Treader (Hillary's dark smile is reminiscent of Stalin's inhuman grin...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies]

To: Cautor
Harry Reid should go straight to hell. He deserves it. He's a lying sorry ass bastard.

Reid is the political equivalent of a street punk.

254 posted on 11/16/2005 10:34:31 PM PST by tarheelswamprat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Pride in the USA; Stillwaters
Check out the full transcript of his remarks at Full transcript. His opening remarks include the following:

"It's a pleasure to see all of you. I'm sorry that we couldn't be joined by Senators Harry Reid, John Kerry, or Jay Rockefeller. They were unable to attend due to a prior lack of commitment."

Oh my.

255 posted on 11/16/2005 11:37:23 PM PST by lonevoice (Vast Right Wing Pajama Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lonevoice

Mr Cheney, the SADDEST part is that LIBERALS will say or do ANYTHING to try and take political advantage...even if it means imperiling our troops and our country!!!!


256 posted on 11/17/2005 2:00:47 AM PST by Jazzman1 (lol)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies]

To: lonevoice

Wow! That IS good.


257 posted on 11/17/2005 2:06:56 AM PST by advance_copy (Stand for life, or nothing at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288
"I'm sorry that we couldn't be joined by Senators Harry Reid, John Kerry, or Jay Rockefeller. They were unable to attend due to a prior lack of commitment." Vice President Cheney"

Wow!

I sure wish he'd run for POTUS.
258 posted on 11/17/2005 4:15:41 AM PST by Preachin' (Enoch's testimony was that he pleased God: Why are we still here?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: Jazzman1
What is really stupid about the Dems lies is that:

If the President knew, for certain as they are lying about, that there were no WMD in Iraq, he would not purposely jeopardize his record -- risk that it would be found out he knew -- and still have attacked Iraq anyway. He would have been pretty stupid to just go ahead and wait for it to be discovered that he knew something different than the whole world of people who agreed that the WMD's were there.

And, if he did, indeed know for certain there were no WMD's in Iraq....who else did? I mean, someone else must have told him, right? He didn't go there and explore the country himself. Where is the proof? Where are the people who must have advised him otherwise? Who are THEY?

There is absolutely no logic to the lies of the Dems. If they believe that the President is privvy to information that no one else in the world had - where did that information come from?

259 posted on 11/17/2005 4:15:42 AM PST by CitizenM ("An excuse is worse than an lie, because an excuse is a lie hidden." Pope John Paul, II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies]

To: conservativebabe
I love you even more now, if that's possible!

Well gosh *blushing*--thank you! :-D

260 posted on 11/17/2005 5:14:49 AM PST by silent_jonny (No Fitzmas in Ratsville)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 321-334 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson