Link takes you to ABC "The Note" page. Need to page down to get to section titled "The Fitzgerald investigation:"
1 posted on
11/16/2005 1:37:14 PM PST by
frankjr
To: frankjr
It wasn't Cheney. In Woodward's statement, he says he tried to schedule an interview with Cheney after Plame's identity was revealed by the "high Administration official".
To: frankjr
So what if Cheney did tell him? We've established that it wasn't a crime.
3 posted on
11/16/2005 1:42:06 PM PST by
Brilliant
To: frankjr
IMHO Woodward's been used so much by so many "intelligence" groups that if he was a woman and they were men, he'd be a major slut. But he's not a woman.
4 posted on
11/16/2005 1:44:01 PM PST by
GOPJ
(Frenchmen should ask immigrants "Do you want to be Frenchmen?" not, "Will you work cheap?")
To: All
8 posted on
11/16/2005 1:49:17 PM PST by
areafiftyone
(Politicians Are Like Diapers, Both Need To Be Changed Often And For The Same Reason!)
To: frankjr
Woodward is so attached to Colin Powell he could check for polyps. That's why his source was "senior Administration" but not White House.
9 posted on
11/16/2005 1:49:31 PM PST by
Dilbert56
To: frankjr
ABC still looking for the story that aint.
To: frankjr
At first I felt sorry for Libby, feeling he was a fall guy but now I found out he was a close friend and lawyer to Marc Rich, he can rot in prison as far as I am concerned.
13 posted on
11/16/2005 2:00:04 PM PST by
fish hawk
(I am only one, but I am not the only one.)
To: frankjr
The left will do anything to keep this non-story on THEIR front pages. And so far they have been most successful.Even though most Americans do not know or care what the story is about.
15 posted on
11/16/2005 2:00:15 PM PST by
ardara
To: frankjr
I'm going to go read up on quantum physics...it's not nearly as confusing as this story has become, nor quite as boring.
To: frankjr
So it wasn't Rove or Cheney.
To: frankjr
Knowing Woodward's reliance on dead informants, his " high administration source" was probably William Rehnquist.
To: frankjr
I find it fascinating the MSM is still concentrating on the outing of a desk jockey at Langley, but no one in MSM seems to be the least intrested in the interview with Senator Jay Rockefeller with Chris Wallace in which Rockefeller admits he told the Syrian and Jordanian heads of state that GW planned on invading Iraq. This of course was given to Saddam who had plenty of time to get rid of those pesky WMD's. Why is there no cat calls for an investigation of a US senator who was acting like he was a representative of the State Department even though he admits he was over there on his own volition?
Could it be it does not matter what a Democrat does?
I think so.
To: frankjr
What did Woodward Know and When did he Know It?? Merry Fitzmas!
Pray for W and Our Freedom Fighters
37 posted on
11/16/2005 3:10:26 PM PST by
bray
(Iraq, freed from Saddamn now Pray for Freedom from Mohammad)
To: frankjr
Er, why are they all missing that Woodward said "FORMER" government official. Ixnay on th Aneyche.
39 posted on
11/16/2005 4:14:48 PM PST by
LS
To: frankjr
Woodward testified that he talked with THREE people, Libby, Rove, and an unnamed third PAST ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL. He testified that Libby and Rove did NOT drop Plame's name, but that the third PAST ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL was the person that did.
Info from Brit Hume's program tonight.
LLS
40 posted on
11/16/2005 4:17:14 PM PST by
LibLieSlayer
(Preserve America... kill terrorists... destroy dims!)
To: frankjr
48 posted on
11/16/2005 8:39:36 PM PST by
GOPJ
(Frenchmen should ask immigrants "Do you want to be Frenchmen?" not, "Will you work cheap?")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson