Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Spaceward Foundation announces details for 2006 Space Elevator Challenge
SpaceRef.com, Spaceward Foundation ^ | November 16, 2005 | Spaceward Foundation

Posted on 11/16/2005 1:02:51 PM PST by tricky_k_1972

The Spaceward Foundation announces details for 2006 Space Elevator Challenge

PRESS RELEASE
Date Released: Wednesday, November 16, 2005

Source: Spaceward Foundation

image

Prize money to triple for 2006 Space Elevator competition.

Following the success of the recent 2005 Space Elevator competition held at NASA's Ames Research Center, the Spaceward Foundation announced today the details for the 2006 event, to be held on August 4th in Mountain View California, in the heart of Silicon Valley.

"The 2005 challenge was a great event for us" said Ben Shelef, founder of the Spaceward Foundation who is organizing the competitions, "and with 30 teams on the roster so far, and a first prize of $150,000 for each of two competitions, the 2006 event is looking to be even more exciting."

The top contenders in the 2005 challenge were two Canadian university teams, from the University of British Columbia and the University of Saskatchewan. The 2006 event is attracting attention from many universities including MIT, MTU, and Virginia Tech which sent an entire team to observe the 2005 competition.

The Space Elevator challenge consists of two competitions - one focused on power beaming, and the second on tether strength. These two competitions target the development of lightweight yet strong tether materials and wireless power transmission technologies, two of the key technologies required for the creation of a Space Elevator.

The Tether Challenge centers on the creation of a material that combines light weight and incredible strength. Under this challenge, teams will develop high strength materials that will be stretched in a head-to-head competition to see which tether is strongest.

The Beam Power challenge focuses on the development of wireless power technologies for a wide range of exploration purposes, such as human lunar exploration and long-duration Mars reconnaissance. In this challenge, teams will develop wireless power transmission systems, including transmitters and receivers, to power robotic climbers to lift the greatest weight possible to the top of a 50 meter (165 feet) cable, moving at least 1 m/s (3 feet per second).

The prizes for the 2006 event will total $400,000, and are provided by NASA's Centennial Challenges program. NASA's Centennial Challenges program promotes technical innovation through a novel program of prize competitions. It is designed to tap the nation's ingenuity to make revolutionary advances to support the Vision for Space Exploration and NASA goals.

The Space Elevator concept was first introduced in the 1960s and has only recently garnered serious attention due to advances in materials and power transfer technologies. If built, a Space Elevator would provide a safe, low cost, way to launch payloads such as satellites into orbit.

Interested teams are encouraged to sign up on the event website at http://www.elevator2010.org/site/competition.html. The deadline for this year’s registration is Jan 1st, 2006.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: elevator; hinduropetrick; indianropetrick; magicropetrick; nasa; space; spaceelevator; spaceexploration
Climb higher, Climb faster, Reach for the Stars!
1 posted on 11/16/2005 1:02:51 PM PST by tricky_k_1972
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis; Frank_Discussion; unibrowshift9b20; RightWhale; El Sordo; SauronOfMordor; ...

Space Ping! If you want on or off this list please Freepmail me.
My Home Page

2 posted on 11/16/2005 1:03:27 PM PST by tricky_k_1972 (Putting on Tinfoil hat and heading for the bomb shelter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tricky_k_1972
The Tether Challenge centers on the creation of a material that combines light weight and incredible strength. Under this challenge, teams will develop high strength materials that will be stretched in a head-to-head competition to see which tether is strongest.

Hmmm... Maybe molecular wire made from buckeyballs?

3 posted on 11/16/2005 2:04:37 PM PST by frithguild (The Freepers moved as a group, like a school of sharks sweeping toward an unaware and unarmed victim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frithguild

Actually the best present technology concept they have come up with so far is carbon nanotubes in an epoxy matrix. The problem is in the carbon nantube manufacutre arena, getting enough of those suckers in our liftime is proving diffucult.


4 posted on 11/16/2005 2:17:25 PM PST by tricky_k_1972 (Putting on Tinfoil hat and heading for the bomb shelter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: frithguild; tricky_k_1972
Actually a composite weaved fiber consisting of Buckytube fibers mixed with carbon fibers show the most promise for so called "space elevator" materials.

Actually Rice University and some other researchers are showing promise in mass production of Bucktube fibers. Of course further breakthroughs will be necessary to increase the production volume and reduce the costs to where it becomes practical to build even moderately sized test fibers.

The good news is that there are plenty of other market applications for this kind of material and this will only help drive down the costs to where it needs to be to build a "space elevator."

I'm not worried about the material development, but I am concerned about the practicality of actually building and operating a "space elevator."
5 posted on 11/16/2005 2:34:43 PM PST by anymouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: anymouse

Carbon nanotubes= Buckytube fibers.


6 posted on 11/16/2005 2:58:55 PM PST by tricky_k_1972 (Putting on Tinfoil hat and heading for the bomb shelter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: tricky_k_1972

Now THIS is how government should do R&D, if it's gonna be done! And this is WHERE government should do R&D, if they are gonna do it at all--look into new, more efficient ways to carry out programs already delivering a public service (though NASA might not entirely qualify there).


7 posted on 11/16/2005 5:37:50 PM PST by LibertarianInExile (Let O'Connor Go Home! Hasn't She Suffered Enough? Hasn't The CONSTITUTION Suffered Enough?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tricky_k_1972

"The Space Elevator concept was first introduced in the 1960s "

actually...

The concept of the space elevator first appeared in 1895 when a Russian scientist Konstantin Tsiolkovsky was inspired by the Eiffel Tower in Paris to consider a tower that reached all the way into space. He imagined placing a "celestial castle" at the end of a spindle-shaped cable, with the "castle" orbiting Earth in a geosynchronous orbit (i.e. the castle would remain over the same spot on Earth's surface). The tower would be built from the ground up to an altitude of 35,790 kilometers above mean sea level (geostationary orbit). Comments from Nikola Tesla suggest that he may have also conceived such a tower. Tsiolkovsky's notes were sent behind the Iron Curtain after his death.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_elevator


8 posted on 11/16/2005 5:41:26 PM PST by edwin hubble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale; Brett66; xrp; gdc314; sionnsar; anymouse; RadioAstronomer; NonZeroSum; jimkress; ...

9 posted on 11/16/2005 7:57:18 PM PST by KevinDavis (http://www.cafepress.com/spacefuture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tricky_k_1972
If built, a Space Elevator would provide a safe, low cost, way to launch payloads such as satellites into orbit.

You better find a source of unobtanium, seldomseenium, and "able to violate the laws of physicsium".

IMHO, the "Space Elevator" even rates below "Project Orion" in my list nutty ideas.

10 posted on 11/17/2005 5:45:18 PM PST by RadioAstronomer (Senior member of Darwin Central)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson