Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/16/2005 11:36:12 AM PST by tightwadbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: tightwadbob

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1522266/posts


2 posted on 11/16/2005 11:37:37 AM PST by Arrowhead1952 (DUmmies are permanently stuck on stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tightwadbob


7.62...is a good round.


4 posted on 11/16/2005 11:42:37 AM PST by in hoc signo vinces ("Houston, TX...a waiting quagmire for jihadis.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tightwadbob

forget 7.62 they need to use .338 Lapua :)


5 posted on 11/16/2005 11:43:22 AM PST by Echo Talon (http://echotalon.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tightwadbob; Squantos

It's the 6.8 SPC :

http://www.defensereview.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=383


6 posted on 11/16/2005 11:45:25 AM PST by PoorMuttly ("He is a [sane] man who can have tragedy in his heart and comedy in his head." - G. K.Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tightwadbob

50 caliber patched roundball behind 90 grains of 3fg powder in a kentucky flintlock will do the trick, as many deer and bear I shot will attest to


10 posted on 11/16/2005 11:53:22 AM PST by sachem longrifle (Proud member of the Fond Du Lac band of the Chippewa people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tightwadbob

We switched from 7.62 to 5.56 back in the early 60's( I think it was under Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara) . The thought behind that is of course cost and the psychological effect on the enemy. Since 5.56 tends to wound more than it kills all the wounded would cause a negative psychological effect on the enemy. Therefore lowering their moral. Basically it was Bean Counter BS.


11 posted on 11/16/2005 11:53:47 AM PST by Sprite518
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tightwadbob

oh great...here we go!

The thread that would not die.


17 posted on 11/16/2005 11:59:36 AM PST by Hammerhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tightwadbob
6.5 Grendel from Alexander Arms
19 posted on 11/16/2005 12:02:27 PM PST by 45Auto (Big holes are (almost) always better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tightwadbob
I have been thinking about this after reading a couple of threads.

I wonder if it would be practical to have the soldiers all armed with a pistol, maybe the new FN high velocity for use in close quarters as a primary weapon instead of the M4. For that matter a high capacity .45 would be good.

For those times when they really needed more power they could use an FN FAL or something similar. In other words, every combat soldier has a pistol and a rifle. The pistol for close quarters and the rifle for everything else.

20 posted on 11/16/2005 12:04:06 PM PST by yarddog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tightwadbob

21 posted on 11/16/2005 12:04:15 PM PST by 45Auto (Big holes are (almost) always better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tightwadbob
The Barrett M468:


24 posted on 11/16/2005 12:08:15 PM PST by 45Auto (Big holes are (almost) always better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tightwadbob
A nice Defense Review article on the 6.8 SPC vs the 6.5 Grendel
26 posted on 11/16/2005 12:09:40 PM PST by 45Auto (Big holes are (almost) always better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tightwadbob

I will probably be flamed for this, but...

Our military has over a million AK's stockpiled from Iraq and Afghanistan and elsewhere. They probably need refurbishing, but they're still cheaper than buying new, and it could probably be done within the military's own refurbish and repair system.

And we have way too much first hand info to let us know the 7.62 Russian is an effective round. Our guys wouldn't have the ability to tell friend from foe by sound, but they will have a rock solid weapons platform proven worldwide.


28 posted on 11/16/2005 12:12:41 PM PST by tanuki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tightwadbob

Well I've had combat experience with both the 5.56 & the 7.62 and I'll take the 7.62 any day.

My fellow Marines in Iraq agree with me too.

Semper Fi,
Kelly


29 posted on 11/16/2005 12:15:16 PM PST by kellynla (U.S.M.C. 1st Battalion,5th Marine Regiment, 1st Marine Div. Viet Nam 69&70 Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tightwadbob
Video clip of Bill Alexander and the 6.5 Grendel in action
32 posted on 11/16/2005 12:18:53 PM PST by 45Auto (Big holes are (almost) always better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tightwadbob
Aint gonna happen

6.8 Remington SPC or maybe even 6.5 Grendel might be an adjunct round as you can use the same lower receiver and most of the upper parts minus bolt and barrel and small parts.

imo

34 posted on 11/16/2005 12:32:27 PM PST by joesnuffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson