Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: M. Peach

Maybe someone can explain the basis of this "case" to me. Fitzgerald is investigating the leaking of an undercover CIA agent's name. Plame is clearly not undercover and therefore the law doesn't apply. He should have immediately ceased the investigation. Any lying done in the course of this investigation should not be a crime as there should have been no investigation to begin with. Why would this not be "fruit from a poisonous tree" - like an illegal search?


120 posted on 11/16/2005 2:05:43 PM PST by JMS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]


To: JMS

"Plame is clearly not undercover and therefore the law doesn't apply. "

I believe she was at the time - and/or her identity is to remain protected in case of retroactive retribution. What I feel is very disingenuous is the idea that the White House would seek retribution by outing Wilson's wife.

If they wanted retribution - there are several other things that could be done - for example - like Clinton using the IRS to audit O'Reilly, Hannity, Limbaugh et al.

In my opinion - Fitzgerald is a liberal opportunist clearly trying to make a name for himself.


140 posted on 11/16/2005 2:42:00 PM PST by M. Peach (eschew obfuscation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson