Why won't the Bush administration get this information out there to shame and embarrass their seditious detractors like Carl Levin and other traitors who sit there and deny the evidence that Bin Laden and Saddam worked together? Why the need by these Democrats to deny facts in order to defend Saddam? These Democrats will defend terrorist prisoners and defend Saddam against charges that he hid WMD work and his dealings with Al Qaeda, and doing so even as they brush past reams of evidence he did both. It is time we had this fight with these people, but unfortunately their rope-a-dope against Bush seems to have worked and has made him timid in speaking out for the truth, i.e. the mountains of evidence beyond that cited here of the Saddam-Al Qaeda connection.
To read more of these connections, check this link of a previous FR post. Scroll down to the red links for more on Saddam's intercourse with Al Qaeda:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1335971/posts
1 posted on
11/16/2005 10:27:55 AM PST by
MikeA
To: MikeA
We will see in the coming days if this is true. MSM will surely squash it.
2 posted on
11/16/2005 10:33:11 AM PST by
HOTTIEBOY
(Maybe in your house. Not in mine.)
To: MikeA
Some of the information in the administration's unreleased classified documents might compromise the war on terror.
Bush will do the right thing, not the politically expedient thing.
3 posted on
11/16/2005 10:33:31 AM PST by
Chunga
(Mock The Left)
To: MikeA
I still want to know who killed Kennedy and those documents won't be released until 2025.
4 posted on
11/16/2005 10:34:37 AM PST by
edcoil
(Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
To: MikeA
what good would it do, the MSM's would never let it get out. although I do believe they should put this out with gusto, and tell TEDDy and the boys to shove it..........
6 posted on
11/16/2005 10:43:22 AM PST by
vin-one
(REMEMBER the WTC !!!!!!!!)
To: MikeA
It amazes me that Bush & the GOP play puching bag for the Demonrat traitors...
7 posted on
11/16/2005 11:00:15 AM PST by
talleyman
(Who would Osamma vote for?)
To: MikeA
(1) "Abdul Rahman Yasin, a fugitive from the [1993 World Trade Center attack], is of Iraqi descent and in 1993 he fled to Iraq with Iraqi assistance."Well duh...I didn't need a classified document to be unclassified to know that:
Ramzi Yousef (1993 WTC) and Terry Nichols (OKC) crossed paths in the Phillipines. Khalid Sheikh Mohammed (9/11)was Yousef's uncle. It is interesting to note that Yousef entered the United States on an Iraqi passport and had been known among the New York fundamentalists as "Rashid, the Iraqi". Another name that could be thrown into the mix is Abdul Rahman Yasin, a U.S. citizen who moved to Iraq in the 1960's and returned to the U.S. in 1992. After the 1993 WTC bombing, Yasin fled to Iraq and was given monthly salary and housing by Saddam Hussein's regime.
Other links
To: MikeA
On August 20, 1998, the Clinton administration bombed the al Shifa pharmaceutical factory in Sudan. The attack came in retaliation for the nearly simultaneous al Qaeda bombings of U.S. embassies in East Africa. A quote from someone who got it right:
"So, when the Clinton administration wants to justify its strike on al Shifa," this official tells me, "it's okay to use an Iraq-al Qaeda connection. But now that the Bush administration and George Tenet talk about links, it's suddenly not believable?"
Weekly StandardSee also:
Clinton first linked al Qaeda to Saddam
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson