To: conservativecorner
In Iraqs case, the lakes and rivers were the toilet, and Syria was the back door.
It is reasonable to surmise that a govt that would bury its planes in the Iranian desert would have no qualms about doing the same with easily concealable WMD. This is more plausible than the contention that the intelligence of Russia, England, US, and France was incorrect.
3 posted on
11/16/2005 6:01:53 AM PST by
etradervic
(Able Danger, Peter Paul Campaign Fraud, Travelgate, Whitewater, Sandy Berger...demand answers!)
To: etradervic
I have always felt Iraq had WMD's ,what I do not under is why the administration keeps saying we were wrong ,there was no weapons .It does not make sense.
To: etradervic
The nay sayer already claimed victory in his own mind. nothing will change this now except..... When these WMD (which don't exist according to the Bush/US hating liberal) resurface; which they will. Syria at some point will either use or threaten to use them.
Then, just like the anti-nuke morons of the past, the non-believing anti war pundit will quickly forget his error.
They have highly selective memory.
Ask if Reagan had anything to do with bringing down that wall.
Ask if nuclear deterrence worked.
They will have forgotten all that as they will their position on Iraq after it's all done.
Red6
71 posted on
11/16/2005 11:17:23 AM PST by
Red6
To: etradervic
Also, don't forget that Saddam flew his air force to Iran prior to the Gulf War.
116 posted on
11/17/2005 7:00:33 AM PST by
kabar
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson