Are you saying physics consists of no physical evidence to support it? Talk about "bizzare" logic!
Are you saying physics consists of no physical evidence to support it? Talk about "bizzare" logic!
No, I'm saying that calling the existence of physics physical evidence for the existence of a creator is bizarre.
And I stand by that. It's a huge leap. Moreover, it's a cop-out. More of the "goddidit" fluff that we've seen so often, guesswork as the end of science instead of its beginning.