To: Dimensio
I hardly think the phyisical attributes of DNA to be devoid of statistical/mathematical analysis, and thus arguments pointing toward the reasonable inference of intelligent design.
To: Fester Chugabrew
I hardly think the phyisical attributes of DNA to be devoid of statistical/mathematical analysis, and thus arguments pointing toward the reasonable inference of intelligent design.
Yes, but every statistical argument presented in that regard has been shown to be founded upon faulty assumptions. In any case, swmobuffalo did not reference any statistical analysis at all. Swmobuffalo stated quite clearly that the basis for his or her rejection of anything apart from intelligent design was his or her own inability to comprehend anything other than that. That is an argument from incredulity and a logical fallacy. Why are you attempting to turn swmobuffalo's argument into something that it was not?
630 posted on
11/16/2005 10:13:56 PM PST by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: Fester Chugabrew
"I hardly think the phyisical attributes of DNA to be devoid of statistical/mathematical analysis, and thus arguments pointing toward the reasonable inference of intelligent design. Could you please take a short segment of DNA that contains some coding, highly preserved non-coding, and non-preserved non-coding sequences and perform your statistical/mathematical analysis on each sequence showing your results. Failing this, show why you believe it to be true, beyond your feeling that it can be done, preferably with cites.
768 posted on
11/17/2005 9:24:00 AM PST by
b_sharp
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson