Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Fester Chugabrew
"If you are that confused over what constitutes a figure of speech it is no wonder you are confused as to what constitutes science."

Since you brought it up, this would be a good time for you to enlighten us as to what it is that separates science from non-science. What is your definition? You have avoided this question thus far.
538 posted on 11/16/2005 7:42:48 PM PST by CarolinaGuitarman ("There is a grandeur in this view of life...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 537 | View Replies ]


To: CarolinaGuitarman

It must be painfully apparent to you by now that I operate with a wider definition of science than most people. For darwin's sake, look it up in the dictionary.

Science is "the observation, identification, description, experimental investigation, and theoretical explanation of phenomena."

When physical matter demonstrates patterns of organization and can be categorized into a table of elements that is rarely appended or modified it stands to reason that perhaps, just maybe, elements of intelligence and design are involved. To attribute massive amounts of organized matter to a single, almighty intelligence is far from unreasonable or unscientific.

It certainly stands on the side of absurdity for kool-aid drinking ideologues to dismiss intelligent design as an unscientific notion while insisting that those who hold intelligent design as operative get on their knees and beg for "scientific" acceptance.

Choking and vomit of lying bastards aside, God created the heavens and the earth scientifically, and He scientifically sustains them.


556 posted on 11/16/2005 8:21:39 PM PST by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 538 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson