[plain talk]

"The more we learn about the microscopic world, the less likely it seems that non-physical (or non-mathematical) principles are needed to explain its behavior."

One of the stupidiest statements I've ever read. the person who wrote that is simply an atheist pushing an agenda. It's the opposite. The more we learn the more likely it is that supernatural processes were required to design this complex universe which include revealed software code embedded in God's creatures.

[editor-surveyor]

"One of the stupidiest statements I've ever read.

Which is why I replied as I did. The statement makes a huge leap of logic, considering that nobody even has an idea how the incrementation is accomplished.

[Ichneumon]

The more we learn the more likely it is that supernatural processes were required to design this complex universe

How do you figure that?