Replies

"It is not as though the notion of "no intelligent designer" is falsifiable either."

I said specifically that both the proposition that a designer exists and that one doesn't exist is outside of science. I said specifically that neither can be falsified. Are we having reading difficulties?

"If you want falsibilty and testability alone to be the standard by which anything is rendered scientific, then what's good for the goose is good for the gander, baby."

As I already stated, multiple times. And I am NOT your baby.

"If there is a.) such thing as intelligence, and b.) such thing as design, then there is no reason science cannot at some point reasonably test for it and detect it."

Yes there is, because design cannot be defined without stating some characteristic (motivation, capability) of the proposed designer. Design can be anything you say it is, as you have already said.

"You've indulged your hatred of God to the point of insanity, and it is unbecoming."

You've practiced your willful ignorance to the point you have to lie about what people say. I have no hatred for God. I have a great distaste for mystical stupidity, which you have provided in abundance.

I have no hatred for God.

Then why do you not believe what He says about creating and sustaining the world?

And I am NOT your baby.

If you are that confused over what constitutes a figure of speech it is no wonder you are confused as to what constitutes science.