Example?
what their motives are,
Example?
what their strategies might be,
Example?
not to mention making scurrilous claims about various tenets of religious belief.
Example?
When challenged, you responded by ignoring the challenge, and merely repeated your claims. <
Where? Post an example.
I do note that we've had a couple of civil exchanges, too. That's much to be desired.
Indeed.
However, your accusatory posts were and remain dishonest.
No, they most certainly are not. They are my honest assessment, based on many years of experience and research on this issue. I may conceivably be mistaken on one or more points, but I am *not* dishonest about it, and I find your accusation deeply offensive, and it is wholly false.
And speaking of dishonest discussion, I note that you have COMPLETELY DODGED the following TWO portions of the post of mine to which you are responding:
Please explain your behavior. Or, alternately, feel free to *document* the times and places I have done the things you have accused me of, and make your case for why you think I've been dishonest (as opposed to, say, misunderstanding a point). When I accuse someone of being dishonest or making a misrepresentation, I point out the passage of theirs which leads me to this conclusion, and I support the reasons for my conclusion.Is there any "special reason" you felt no need to either explain your false accusations, or actually DOCUMENT them? Restating your accusations doesn't count, son. Instead, it just makes you look suspiciously evasive.
Also, you have YET AGAIN dodged the following question -- is that very honest of you?
So here we go around the mulberry bush again -- I'm calling you on your evasion AGAIN, just as I promised I would if you dodged it again. This is the FOURTH TIME you've dodged actually answering the question. Care to make it five?[...] as is your the fact that you have FOR THE THIRD TIME dodged answering the question I asked originally which outraged you so much that you went off on an irrelevant rant about genocide. Here it is again -- care to take another stab at it, or would you like to dodge and make false accusations against me some more?
Finally, your desperate attempt to distract from the question by pointing to a few mass murderers just doesn't answer the question -- why is it that it's the *creationists* who lie so frequently and unashamedly on these discussions, and not the allegedly "godless" evolutionists? Please explain.Dodge *again* (and have me call you on it again), or just answer the question for a change. Your choice.
Or would you like to actually address it finally, *and* actually document these "lies" you keep saying I have told but keep failing to document? Or, feel free to just retract your slander if you realize you can't document it after all.
Response: "the creationists" (especially as a group) are not "frequent liars." You may disagree with their assertions (as indeed do I, many times), but they are not purposely telling lies. Assuming you're among the "godless evolutionists," then your oft-repeated claims about the lies makes you a frequent and unashamed liar.
There's more where this came from, but I think this example alone is enough to demonstrate your lack of honesty in dealing with those with whom you disagree.