The lib tactics belong to people like you who would perpetrate fraud in the name of science, consistently misinterpret and misrepresent evidence, engage in ad-hominem ad nausaeum, all the while claiming to be intellectually superior.
Kindly cite examples of my doing any of that, or retract it.
I have consistently debated you on the evidence. You respond with personal attacks. That is not unexpected, but it is disappointing.
Hey, you were the one to equate "my tactics" with those of liberals. What is that but a personal attack? You support the fraudulent notion that intelligent design is beyond the merits of scientific consideration. You consider my reasonable inference that organized matter implies a designer to be a matter of elevating "feelings" over "fact." You consider your own point of view as the only one worthy of discussion in the schoolroom and thus intellectually superior.
Kindly retract your insidous notion that I argue like a liberal if you wish. The label applies better to yourself.
Actually, in retrospect, I don't mind the ad hominem attacks so much. After all, they are not the sole property or tactic of liberals, and I've dished out more than my share.