Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CarolinaGuitarman
Because there is no evidence conceivable that could not be used to support the idea of a designer.

I reckon that places the reality ball firmly in my court, then. Why you feel so obligated to avoid reality is one of those mysteries that science will never solve.

315 posted on 11/16/2005 12:50:34 PM PST by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 312 | View Replies ]


To: Fester Chugabrew

"I reckon that places the reality ball firmly in my court, then. Why you feel so obligated to avoid reality is one of those mysteries that science will never solve."

No, it means anything can be *evidence* of your hypothesis. Your *feeling* isn't scientific, it's mystical. You can't even hypothetically imagine a fact that could go against your feeling. Your feeling has absolutely zero practical value. If the world was completely disorganized, you would say it was designed. Why not? Anything could be design according to you. Order, chaos; all the same.


323 posted on 11/16/2005 1:00:54 PM PST by CarolinaGuitarman ("There is a grandeur in this view of life...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 315 | View Replies ]

To: Fester Chugabrew
"I reckon that places the reality ball firmly in my court, then. Why you feel so obligated to avoid reality is one of those mysteries that science will never solve."

I the designer is capable of creating a given artifact he/she/it can easily emulate nature. There's the rub. If you, as most IDIsts are wont to do, create a mutually exclusive and exhaustive dichotomy of designed or natural, the ability to emulate pretty much makes it impossible to determine an artifact's true origin.

448 posted on 11/16/2005 3:45:00 PM PST by b_sharp (Ad space for rent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 315 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson