The "idealogues" are the ones who want to re-define science.
Words mean things.
Precisely. They are the ones who declare ID to be "unscientific" merely because it implies a Creator. Narrow minds and all that. They are the ones who would exclude inferences, implications, possibilities, hunches, and the like as being "unscientific." Fortunately they do not corner the market in science, let alone truth and education in general.
Any wino living in a cardboard carton if free to conjure up his own definition of science. But he only talks to other winos, and occasional welfare workers. And no one cares what they think about science.