[Fester Chugabrew]

The philosphy of evolution has already elbowed its way into the science classroom. You haven't a clue what actually constitutes evidence for a hypothesis.

So the presence of organized matter that carries out numerous, purposeful functions is not evidence for design? What do these things evidence, then? Fact is, there is so much evidence for intelligent design it goes unnoticed, much like the ongoing bodily functions of breathing, or blinking. Intelligent design is the basis for all science.

The philosophy of evolution has yet to learn its place. It is merely the birth-child of a recent intellectual lightweight named Charles Darwin. You're not doing him any favors.

[b_sharp]

"Intelligent design is the basis for all science.

I'm not sure what you mean by that, but intelligent design is certainly not the basis for all science investigates. IDists are saying that 'what' science investigates contains ID not that science 'uses' ID.