Ah, I get it.
There are no scientific standards, there are no legitimate scientific institutions, and words don't mean anything.
At least I now understand where you're coming from.
It is an unscientific standard to omit the possibility of occurences in physical matter that run contrary to established physical laws. The legitimacy of scientific institutions is based chiefly upon their ability to seek and obtain accurate knowledge about the fields of study in which they are engaged. Words do indeed mean things, and must be carefully applied in expressing what may, or may not, constitute objective reality.