I wrote in response:
Shame on you and your snide attitude.
To which you replied:
I feel no need to apologize to narrow-minded ideologues who think themselves supportive of science, and I feel no shame in calling them such.
Well, you should. I am neither narrow-minered nor an ideologue. I have tried to remain patient with you, even taking the time to explain how you are mistaken on scientific principles. In thanks, you heap verbal abuse on me. You very well should feel shame at your behavior. There are people around here with vastly more experience and knowledge than I who are willing to take the time to explain to you any aspect of science and engineering from anatomy to zoology. None of them are the idolaters you have characterized them as being, and none of them should "go away." By calling them narrow-minded idologues you insult them greatly, as you have insulted me and nearly everyone on these threads. You ought to reconsider your behavior towards them and me.
As long as you are unwilling to leave the question open as to whether God is scientifically accessible or not you are both of the above. As long as you the support the use of force (i.e. the Law) to prevent acknowledgement of alternate points of view in public schools you are even worse, a despot.
I must admit you have been more than liberal in your attempts to enlighten me, and for that I do owe you thanks.