Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Woodward Was Told of Plame More Than Two Years Ago
Washington Post ^ | November 15, 20005 | Jim VandeHei and Carol D. Leonnig

Posted on 11/15/2005 8:49:00 PM PST by atomicweeder

Washington Post Assistant Managing Editor Bob Woodward testified under oath Monday in the CIA leak case that a senior administration official told him about CIA operative Valerie Plame and her position at the agency nearly a month before her identity was disclosed . . .

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bobwoodward; cialeak; fibbermcgees; plame; rovegate; woodward
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 441-446 next last
To: Southack

Thanks again for another good summary


301 posted on 11/16/2005 10:18:43 AM PST by petercooper (I was misled. I actually voted for war, before I wanted to vote against it with 20/20 hindsight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: atomicweeder
Sounds like there's a fairly large spat going on at the WP.

I believe Woodward has been warning publicly that there is no "there" there in this investigation.

He has been sitting on info all during this investigation that shows that it's a sham.

Meanwhile, his paper didn't listen to him and ran with the so-called scandal (the Editor and Pinkus).

Now Woodward's talking because his source released him. He is now saying I told you so to the people he works with. This is another great example of the disintegration going on in the MSM. Very sweet.

302 posted on 11/16/2005 10:25:12 AM PST by Siena Dreaming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP
David Corn published the following article in The Nation just two days after the Novak article: A White House Smear. If you read the article, it becomes clear that Wilson was talking with Corn prior to the July 14 Novak article. This was a set up.
303 posted on 11/16/2005 10:31:59 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 296 | View Replies]

To: Purrcival
I saw that to! That question has never been answered as to who sent Joe Wilson. Wilson first said it was the VP's office but when brought before the Senate committee he said otherwise from what I remember.
304 posted on 11/16/2005 10:34:53 AM PST by rip033 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: js1138

Could be that Russert lied. Several of us noted he looked uneasy the day of the indictment.

Regardless, I feel all of this is bullhockey upon bullhockey upon bullhockey...important mind you...but all so ridiculously grade school...I smell Hill and Bill, somewhere, trying to cover something big, but they just can't mask the smell.

We've got the UN trying to buy Oil for Food,
WAS someone trying to buy dessert.. Yellow Cake?
If so, was a middleman helping to negotiate a covert deal?
Perhaps to nuke Iraq? Two birds with one stone because no one ever took care of business properly in eight years and W hollered, "Put up or shut up"?

Just what was The Burgler stuffing in his pants?


305 posted on 11/16/2005 10:41:00 AM PST by freema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: Democratshavenobrains
If that idiot Scooter had just gotten his story straight and not lied, there would be nothing but vapor and crying DUers.

Do you really think that Scooter Libby is stupid enough to go in an dperjure himself while turning over his own notes that contradict his statements? Or is it more likely, in that case, that it was a memory lapse?

Fitzgerald knows the answer to that, too, but he indicted Libby anyway.

306 posted on 11/16/2005 10:45:33 AM PST by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Siena Dreaming
It also sounds like the prosecutors prosecutor is stuck on stupid
307 posted on 11/16/2005 10:47:55 AM PST by JIM O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 302 | View Replies]

To: Dave S

Thanx...
I know Libby wasn't indicted for leaking (though the indictment counts are set-up to take that step).

Woodward's testimony does lend credence to the fact that the media knew about Plame.

Woodward's testimony may help shoot holes(though I doubt it) in the indictment counts, where it says Libby lied when he said heard that the media knew about Plame during conversations with Miller,Russert and Cooper.

As for Libby, his trial will be all "he said\she said".

I'm hoping Novak gets to spill everything he knows.


308 posted on 11/16/2005 10:48:38 AM PST by stylin19a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: All

Go to Drudge and read linked article from Pincus.

He sounds like a backpeddaling -lying creep.


309 posted on 11/16/2005 10:49:53 AM PST by sissyjane (Don't be stuck on stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 308 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

The "official" is not Libby

Seems like Prosecutor was not so Johnny on the spot after all. With all this carp you would think msm would be out in full force reporting this, but heck no, they don't want the TRUTH to be known by stupid main stream americans,


310 posted on 11/16/2005 11:04:58 AM PST by JFC (W, I am with YA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: sissyjane
Hehe.

Pinkus is lying, and Pinkus knows that Woodward knows that Pinkus knows he's a liar.

311 posted on 11/16/2005 11:13:05 AM PST by Siena Dreaming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 309 | View Replies]

To: penelopesire
...Libby is innocent...

-----
Fitzgerald said Libby is innocent of outing a "covert" agent. She wasn't "covert." What he charged Scooter with was lying to the investigators. All Woodward is doing here is trying to keep the flames burning and the finger pointed at Carl Rove or Dick Cheney. The others in the media are right away going to use this talking point, you watch.
312 posted on 11/16/2005 11:15:30 AM PST by gooleyman ( What about the baby's "RIGHT TO CHOOSE"?????? I bet the baby would chose LIFE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Allan
I'm am not even going to read BW's statement.
1) It's irrelevant
2) He's irrelevant
3) He hates Bush so much (foaming at the mouth hate) that I would have had to have been standing there with him to believe what he says.
313 posted on 11/16/2005 11:16:56 AM PST by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s......you weren't really there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Purrcival

If the Dimmycraps taught us anything, it's the aret of parsing. Note that he didn't say which administration. And remember, a Clintonite controlled the CIA.


314 posted on 11/16/2005 11:33:29 AM PST by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: gooleyman

If she wasn't covert, Woodward knows there would be no point in trying to finger Rove or Cheney.


315 posted on 11/16/2005 11:39:05 AM PST by Siena Dreaming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 312 | View Replies]

To: gooleyman

You are probably right.


316 posted on 11/16/2005 11:44:19 AM PST by penelopesire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 312 | View Replies]

To: gooleyman

Regardless of the wording of the indictment, Fitzgerald has stated publicly that Plame was not known to reporters except as a result of Libbey. We now know that this is not true. The defense is hardly warmed up.


317 posted on 11/16/2005 11:47:54 AM PST by js1138 (Great is the power of steady misrepresentation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 312 | View Replies]

To: freema

"Regardless, I feel all of this is bullhockey upon bullhockey upon bullhockey...important mind you...but all so ridiculously grade school...I smell Hill and Bill, somewhere, trying to cover something big, but they just can't mask the smell."

Yeah. And I'll bet Teddy boy is right in there tellin' em both what to do next.


318 posted on 11/16/2005 11:54:59 AM PST by Mrs. Darla Ruth Schwerin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too
So what are you saying, that Woodward knowingly withheld exculpatory evidence for partisan politcal purposes?

Wopuldn't surprise me.

319 posted on 11/16/2005 11:58:29 AM PST by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: kabar

I'm not finding where it shows that he and Wilson talked.


320 posted on 11/16/2005 12:01:35 PM PST by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 303 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 441-446 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson