Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Woodward Was Told of Plame More Than Two Years Ago
Washington Post ^ | November 15, 20005 | Jim VandeHei and Carol D. Leonnig

Posted on 11/15/2005 8:49:00 PM PST by atomicweeder

Washington Post Assistant Managing Editor Bob Woodward testified under oath Monday in the CIA leak case that a senior administration official told him about CIA operative Valerie Plame and her position at the agency nearly a month before her identity was disclosed . . .

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bobwoodward; cialeak; fibbermcgees; plame; rovegate; woodward
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 441-446 next last
To: Dave S
Unfortunately Fleischer testified that he didnt know about Wilson and his wife until a week or so before the Novak column ...

Do you have a link for this?

261 posted on 11/16/2005 7:24:36 AM PST by jennyjenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]

To: atomicweeder

"In a more than two-hour deposition, Woodward told Special Counsel Patrick J. Fitzgerald that the official casually told him in mid-June 2003 that Plame worked as a CIA analyst on weapons of mass destruction, and that he did not believe the information to be classified or sensitive, according to a statement Woodward released yesterday."

Sounds to me like Mr. Woodward is a bit unsure of where to place his loyalty. Should it be with the United States of America, or any other nation that would like his loyalty?
I also think that the ringleader of all the messes that have recently occurred in Washington, had bunches and bunches of trash in their back pocket, just a waitin' to deposit it. My guess is they are tremendously upset that Bush has appointed Roberts as Chief Justice of The Supreme Court(and has been confirmed)and also Alito(yet to be confirmed). These folks ACTUALLY adhere to OUR constitution and that is just a terrible, terrible thing to some. How 'bout if Mr. Woodward spends his time finding out who is NOT loyal to Our constitution, instead of sifting through trash?


262 posted on 11/16/2005 7:35:24 AM PST by Mrs. Darla Ruth Schwerin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dave S
Unfortunately Fleischer testified that he didnt know about Wilson and his wife until a week or so before the Novak column when Libby told him.

I think before any trial takes place, there will be so many he said-she saids and so many memory lapses that a successful prosecution will be impossible. Already we have two contradictions made under oath and one made on TV.

Even professional reporters with notes are having memory lapses.

This is not good prosecution testimony, when the "crime" is misremembering.

263 posted on 11/16/2005 7:40:19 AM PST by js1138 (Great is the power of steady misrepresentation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]

To: bybybill
The only one left to stick his nose into this mess is Jessie Jackson

You won't see him--it's a white-on-white crime.

264 posted on 11/16/2005 7:53:40 AM PST by randog (What the....?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Timeout
Perhaps he was mistaken when he said it was Russert. In fact, it was likely Woodward.

So Russert is not a liar and conspirator as people have been claiming?

265 posted on 11/16/2005 7:53:41 AM PST by Dave S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
my money is on Tenet as the source

Mine too. Who would a reporter logically go to to get information on a story about an envoy sent by the CIA to Niger? The CIA, of course. Remember, Tenet and James Pavitt (Plame's boss) both resigned within four days of each other for "personal reasons" along with Jami Miscik,CIA Deputy Director for Intelligence (for what she called a "natural evolution", although rumor has it that she was asked to leave). According to Wayne Madsen, he was told by the DoJ that these resignations were connected to the Plame investigation. While Madsen is considered by some to be a leftist kook, as is Seymour Hersch (who said the CIA admitted they forged the documents), I just can't fathom them publicly reporting false conversations with officials connected to the case. Also, they are normally critical of Bush, why would they print something untrue that would seem to exhonerate the Bush Admin on this?

266 posted on 11/16/2005 7:54:31 AM PST by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette

Excellent observation, Mike.


267 posted on 11/16/2005 8:03:08 AM PST by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies]

To: Timeout
Doesn't this add the possibility that Libby heard it from Woodward but mistakenly attributed it to Russert?

Even if true that he had heard it from Woodward, that doesnt change the fact that Libby attempted to mislead the investigators and lied before the grand jury. Saying you simply heard about it from a reporter and passed that on to another reporter is not the full truth. Not if you fail to mention that you had heard about it earllier from Cheney, from two people at the CIA in response to your own request, from a person at the state department in response to your request, and then discuss how do deal with this information with three other government individuals...up until the week before you innocently pass it on as reporter gossip.

268 posted on 11/16/2005 8:08:44 AM PST by Dave S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Darla Ruth Schwerin
Sounds to me like Mr. Woodward is a bit unsure of where to place his loyalty. Should it be with the United States of America, or any other nation that would like his loyalty? I also think that the ringleader of all the messes that have recently occurred in Washington, had bunches and bunches of trash in their back pocket, just a waitin' to deposit it. My guess is they are tremendously upset that Bush has appointed Roberts as Chief Justice of The Supreme Court(and has been confirmed)and also Alito(yet to be confirmed). These folks ACTUALLY adhere to OUR constitution and that is just a terrible, terrible thing to some. How 'bout if Mr. Woodward spends his time finding out who is NOT loyal to Our constitution, instead of sifting through trash?

Darla what did you just say? Although the words are in English, I dont have a clue what you are talking about.

269 posted on 11/16/2005 8:11:20 AM PST by Dave S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies]

To: Dave S

I'm sorry you don't understand what was said.


270 posted on 11/16/2005 8:21:06 AM PST by Mrs. Darla Ruth Schwerin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies]

To: Southack
So it's not much of a stretch to conclude that Ari is "Offical A" (get it), and that he stepped down so that his one mistake wouldn't reflect badly upon his boss.

Hi Southack. "Official A" may or may not be Ari, but he stepped down because he got married and wanted to accept a higher paying opportunity in the private sector. Being a newlywed, he also didn't want to travel as much as the press secretary has to travel.

271 posted on 11/16/2005 8:23:09 AM PST by Wolfstar (The stakes in the global war on terror are too high for politicians to throw out false charges.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a
no law broken...now what ?

Shirly Ewejest!

Libby testified UNDER OATH that he heard someone make a comment that they heard Val worked at the CIA during a 9 o'clock meeting but Fitz discovered documentation that the meeting didn't not take place until 9:30 that morning! Libby must be jailed!

/sarc

272 posted on 11/16/2005 8:28:33 AM PST by houeto (Mr. President, close our borders now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: bagman
Novak has been quoted as saying that the identity of the identifier of Plame would surprise everyone. Not me - I already know that it's General Powell.

Powell would also fit Novak's other description of his source, "he's not a partisan gunslinger."

273 posted on 11/16/2005 8:32:10 AM PST by Wolfstar (The stakes in the global war on terror are too high for politicians to throw out false charges.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]

To: Dave S

"that doesnt change the fact that Libby attempted to mislead the investigators and lied before the grand jury."

Hold off on that until after the trial, Dave.


274 posted on 11/16/2005 8:35:10 AM PST by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies]

To: Democratshavenobrains

IF IF he lied.


275 posted on 11/16/2005 8:36:57 AM PST by fantom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

It's a good thing you're not going to be on the jury when Libby is tried.


276 posted on 11/16/2005 8:41:27 AM PST by Wolfstar (The stakes in the global war on terror are too high for politicians to throw out false charges.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies]

To: Mears
Because it's another one of those "scandals" that the drowner Kennedy has accused George W. Bush of tarnishing the White House with? You know, one of those scandals cooked up in the backrooms of the operatives of the Democrat party and that are eventually found to have no basis yet are still used to smear Pres. Bush. The accusation is enough evidence of guilt, doncha know.
277 posted on 11/16/2005 8:50:36 AM PST by Ghost of Philip Marlowe (Liberals are blind. They are the dupes of Leftists who know exactly what they're doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: atomicweeder
INTERESTING......

Mark Corallo, a spokesman for Rove, said that Rove is not the unnamed official who told Woodward about Plame and that he did not discuss Plame with Woodward.

William Jeffress Jr., one of Libby's lawyers, said yesterday that Woodward's testimony undermines Fitzgerald's public claims about his client and raises questions about what else the prosecutor may not know. Libby has said he learned Plame's identity from NBC's Tim Russert.

"If what Woodward says is so, will Mr. Fitzgerald now say he was wrong to say on TV that Scooter Libby was the first official to give this information to a reporter?" Jeffress said last night. "The second question I would have is: Why did Mr. Fitzgerald indict Mr. Libby before fully investigating what other reporters knew about Wilson's wife?"

Libby's lawyers are smiling. DUmmies are claiming foul.

278 posted on 11/16/2005 8:51:23 AM PST by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestu s globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: atomicweeder
AP on Yahoo

Bob Woodward testifies in CIA leak

Text: Bob Woodward's Public Statement

Reuters on Yahoo

Woodward testifies in CIA leak probe

279 posted on 11/16/2005 9:04:26 AM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Monthly Donor spoken Here. Go to ... https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: antonico
1) If everyone in Washington knew Plame wasn't covert (and let's assume the CIA also knew she wasn't covert), why then did the CIA ask the Justice Department to investigate this?

The CIA is best known for what? Creating false identities.

So how hard do you think it would have been for them to create a false "cover" for a falsely covert Plame? ;)

280 posted on 11/16/2005 9:10:21 AM PST by mosquitobite (As the Iraqis stand up, we will stand down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 441-446 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson